<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judiciary Committee on Net Neutrality Hearing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blacknell.net/dynamic/2006/04/25/judiciary-committee-on-net-neutrality-hearing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blacknell.net/dynamic/2006/04/25/judiciary-committee-on-net-neutrality-hearing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blacknell.net &#187; Tim Wu on YouTube</title>
		<link>http://blacknell.net/dynamic/2006/04/25/judiciary-committee-on-net-neutrality-hearing/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Blacknell.net &#187; Tim Wu on YouTube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blacknell.net/dynamic/2006/04/25/judiciary-committee-on-net-neutrality-hearing/#comment-414</guid>
		<description>[...] Tim Wu has a great piece on Slate, arguing that YouTube greatly benefits from the notice and takedown processes provided by the much (and rightly) reviled DMCA. Much as he&#8217;s done with net neutrality issues, Tim&#8217;s done an excellent job of describing the crux of the issue: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tim Wu has a great piece on Slate, arguing that YouTube greatly benefits from the notice and takedown processes provided by the much (and rightly) reviled DMCA. Much as he&#8217;s done with net neutrality issues, Tim&#8217;s done an excellent job of describing the crux of the issue: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
