<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Primary Wars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blacknell.net/dynamic/2007/11/17/primary-wars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blacknell.net/dynamic/2007/11/17/primary-wars/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MB</title>
		<link>http://blacknell.net/dynamic/2007/11/17/primary-wars/#comment-42008</link>
		<dc:creator>MB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blacknell.net/dynamic/2007/11/17/primary-wars/#comment-42008</guid>
		<description>I wasn't trying to peg Clinton with this (the idea was more to highlight a tactical response that I liked), but that's a fair point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t trying to peg Clinton with this (the idea was more to highlight a tactical response that I liked), but that&#8217;s a fair point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://blacknell.net/dynamic/2007/11/17/primary-wars/#comment-42003</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blacknell.net/dynamic/2007/11/17/primary-wars/#comment-42003</guid>
		<description>Why do you assume the Clinton campaign is running a "whispering campaign"? Because Novak says so?  I think he has been forced to back down a bit and acknowledge he has no direct source for his claim.

Perhaps you are the one trafficking in wholly unsubstantiated charges here.  (I'm kidding.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you assume the Clinton campaign is running a &#8220;whispering campaign&#8221;? Because Novak says so?  I think he has been forced to back down a bit and acknowledge he has no direct source for his claim.</p>
<p>Perhaps you are the one trafficking in wholly unsubstantiated charges here.  (I&#8217;m kidding.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
