{"id":5138,"date":"2012-08-12T20:52:29","date_gmt":"2012-08-13T00:52:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blacknell.net\/dynamic\/?p=5138"},"modified":"2012-08-12T20:52:29","modified_gmt":"2012-08-13T00:52:29","slug":"rethinking-it-all","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blacknell.net\/dynamic\/2012\/08\/12\/rethinking-it-all\/","title":{"rendered":"Rethinking It All"},"content":{"rendered":"

There’s so much to unpack here<\/a>, and I while I’m not up for doing that right now, it’s so compelling that I want to pass it on:<\/p>\n

\n

For most workers, there is no such thing as the long term. As sociologist Richard Sennett put it in his book The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism, the post-Fordist worker \u00e2\u20ac\u0153lives in a world marked \u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 by short-term flexibility and flux \u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 Corporations break up or join together, jobs appear and disappear, as events lacking connection.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d (30) Throughout history, humans have learned to come to terms with the traumatic upheavals caused by war or natural disasters, but \u00e2\u20ac\u0153[w]hat\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s peculiar about uncertainty today,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Sennett points out, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153is that it exists without any looming historical disaster; instead it is woven into the everyday practices of a vigorous capitalism.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

I can’t imagine that even the most aggressive proponent of The Market(TM) would argue with this (tho’ I’d expect they’d point to some as yet unseen upside of mobility and efficiency). \u00c2\u00a0And truly, who reading this could argue with the following?<\/p>\n

The consequence of the normalisation of uncertainty is a permanent state of low-level panic. Fear, which attaches to particular objects, is replaced by a more generalised anxiety, a constant twitching, an inability to settle. The uncertainty of work is intensified by digital communication technology. As soon as there is email, there are no longer working hours nor a workplace. What characterises the present moment more than our anxious checking \u00e2\u20ac\u201c of our messages, which may bring opportunities or demands (often both at the same time), or, more abstractly, of our status, which, like the stock market is constantly under review, never finally resolved?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

It’s very tempting (and even somewhat justified) to respond to that with a flip “First world problems!” statement. \u00c2\u00a0But that doesn’t address the real claim. \u00c2\u00a0While I don’t think the interjection of atheism is helpful in the following, the central thrust of it is dead on:<\/p>\n

Campagna\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s call for a \u00e2\u20ac\u0153radial atheism\u00e2\u20ac\u009d is based on the recognition that the precariousness that cannot be eliminated is that of life and the body. If there is no afterlife, then our time is finite. Curiously, however, we subjects of late capitalism act as if there is infinite time to waste on work. Work looms over us as never before. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153In an eccentric and an extreme society like ours,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d argue Carl Cederstr\u00c3\u00b6m and Peter Fleming in their book Dead Man Working, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153working has assumed a universal presence \u00e2\u20ac\u201c a \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcworker\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s society in the worst sense of the term \u00e2\u20ac\u201c where even the unemployed and children become obsessed with it.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d (2) Work now colonises weekends, late evenings, even our dreams. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Under Fordism, weekends and leisure time were still relatively untouched,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Cederstr\u00c3\u00b6m and Fleming point out. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Today, however, capital seeks to exploit our sociality in all spheres of work. When we all become \u00e2\u20ac\u02dchuman capital\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 we not only have a job, or perform a job. We are the job.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Seriously, step back and think of that. \u00c2\u00a0While I feel like I could argue about slight exceptions and exemptions, the core of it? \u00c2\u00a0Has no answer. \u00c2\u00a0What comes next? \u00c2\u00a0Echos deeply, for many of us:<\/p>\n

Given all of this, it is clear that most political struggles at the moment amount to a war over time. The generalised debt crisis that hangs over all areas of capitalist life and culture \u00e2\u20ac\u201c from banks to housing and student funding \u00e2\u20ac\u201c is ultimately about time. Averting the alleged catastrophe (of the end of capitalism) will heighten the apocalyptic temporality of everyday life, as the anticipation of catastrophe gives way to a sense that we are already living through the catastrophe and it, like work, will never end.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Yeah.<\/p>\n

But it goes beyond work:<\/p>\n

\u00c2\u00a0The consequence is a strange kind of existential state, in which exhaustion bleeds into insomniac overstimulation (no matter how tired we are, there is still time for one more click) and enjoyment and anxiety co-exist (the urge to check emails, for instance, is both something we must do for work and a libidinal compulsion, a psychoanalytic drive that is never satisfied no matter how many messages we receive).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Here’s a secret. \u00c2\u00a0One of the most calming things I know is the closing of the doors on an aircraft. \u00c2\u00a0When that happens, it’s a raising of drawbridges, a closing of doors, an acceptable ceasing of activity. \u00c2\u00a0It’s often preludes the most productive times I have.<\/p>\n

But really? \u00c2\u00a0It’s meaningless. I should be able to create those conditions on my own, no? \u00c2\u00a0What stops me from raising the drawbridge, closing the doors, and ignoring the world for a bit?<\/p>\n

Nothing.<\/p>\n

Well.<\/p>\n

Except for everything.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

There’s so much to unpack here, and I while I’m not up for doing that right now, it’s so compelling that I want to pass it on: For most workers, there is no such thing as the long term. As sociologist Richard Sennett put it in his book The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":4,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"anyone","activitypub_status":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5138","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-society"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blacknell.net\/dynamic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5138","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blacknell.net\/dynamic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blacknell.net\/dynamic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blacknell.net\/dynamic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blacknell.net\/dynamic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5138"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/blacknell.net\/dynamic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5138\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5140,"href":"https:\/\/blacknell.net\/dynamic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5138\/revisions\/5140"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blacknell.net\/dynamic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5138"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blacknell.net\/dynamic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5138"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blacknell.net\/dynamic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5138"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}