Politics, open government, and safe streets. And the constant incursion of cycling.

Month: March 2008 Page 3 of 4

More Like This: Obama’s Speech

It’s probably too late, but I’ll say this anyway: ignore all the coverage you see of the speech that Obama gave today, and go watch or read it yourself.  It’s a little slow at the beginning, but I think it’s one of the best speeches on race in America (and how it affects our political discourse) that I’ve heard from a national politician in a very very long time.   Instead of running from the issue, or smoothing it over with meaningless platitudes, Obama grabbed it head on and spoke frankly.  I think every politician could take a lesson here.  And if they actually paid attention to that lesson, they could help create a climate in which a substantive and productive discussion on race in America could take place.

I have been – and remain – an Obama skeptic.  And there are a good number of things I’d change about that speech, were I giving it.  That said, I think it represents a real step forward in political discourse.  We’d all do well to take a look at it ourselves, instead of through the filter of cable news or short online summaries.

DC Gun Case: a Brief Clarification of Context

It seems that today’s Supreme Court hearing of the case concerning DC’s gun regulations is getting a lot of media play today.  One of the things I keep hearing is that DC only bans *handguns*, and that residents are free to keep shotguns and rifles for self defense.   And in that context, I suppose a handgun ban sounds a little more reasonable than it might otherwise.  But this simply isn’t true, in a practical sense – securing the required permit for your shotgun/rifle is ridiculously difficult (bordering on impossible), and even if you do get it, the law requires that the gun be rendered nonfunctional at all times.  There is no self-defense exception to that requirement.  So what we have, in DC, is an effective complete ban on the legal possession of any firearm for self defense.  I wish the reporting would be a little clearer on that.

If you record it . . .

they will watch.  And listen.  And examine.
I was talking with a friend last week about my concerns over the proliferating CCTV camera network in DC.  He pointed out that there were no documented abuses, and that it seemed entirely sensible to put technology in the service of safety.   And I suppose that when you take it in the narrowest sense – that the cameras will only be used to investigate specific crimes that have occurred, it’s not entirely objectionable.  But the problem is that the narrow purpose rarely stays narrow – if there’s a way for the state to expand its surveillance of citizens and collection of information, I think it almost always will.

Case in point: Britain’s MI5 intelligence service wants to regularly monitor the movements of London’s Oystercard users (an RFID pass used for Tube/public transport trips, similar to DC’s SmarTrip).   This isn’t a case of MI5 wanting to follow up on an individual already of interest to the authorities – they already have the power to access those records.  Rather, MI5 wants to look at everyone’s trips, matching it to other information they’ve collected, ostensibly to identify patterns that might prevent some act of terrorism.  Of course, any public transport riding terrorist could just eat the extra cost of paying with untraceable paper tickets.

So rather than addressing an actual intelligence need, I think MI5 is – without any real need – just automatically grabbing for as much as it can.  And it’s this natural expansion of powers that we need to think about when agreeing to implement public information collection systems.  The original purpose may well be perfectly sensible, but we need to consider what other purposes these tools can be appropriated for in the future.

And on that note, nothing could possibly go wrong with this, eh?

Primary school children should be eligible for the DNA database if they exhibit behaviour indicating they may become criminals in later life, according to Britain’s most senior police forensics expert.

Gary Pugh, director of forensic sciences at Scotland Yard and the new DNA spokesman for the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo), said a debate was needed on how far Britain should go in identifying potential offenders, given that some experts believe it is possible to identify future offending traits in children as young as five.

Overnight Music: Low Country Boil

The Black Crowes – She Talks to Angels
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1a76FeV2-Dw[/youtube]

Fiona Apple – Criminal

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTpvjNn2BUM[/youtube]

Cassandra Wilson – Children of the Night

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1SWctJBVKw[/youtube]

The last video appears to be someone’s personal project – well worth checking out.

Friday Notes: Too Tired Edition

Eliza’s father died.  Mark Frauenfelder gives an appropriate eulogy, here.

~

Arlington works – last Monday night, I told Arlington County that there was a problem with a portion of the road that runs near my place, and is marked as a bike route.  8 days later, they’re out there and filling 24 potholes.  Color me impressed.

~

I well and truly hate poison ivy.  There is no good purpose of that scourge on this planet.

~

On Elliot Spitzer:  yes, he should resign.  But really, you GOP folk, you have exactly *zero* room to make moralizing pronouncements on it.   And really, this screwup strikes me as something as should be mostly dealt with between him and his wife.  Still, I find it somewhat appropriate that Spitzer was snagged by the financial transaction rules he himself pushed into place.

Journey of Mankind

Another excellent refresher on the details you may have forgotten (in the tradition of Imperial History of the Middle East).

Arlington “Street Smart” Initiative Underway

The Arlington County Police Department has started to step up its “education” and enforcement efforts at Arlington’s most problematic intersections. This period of concentrated enforcement is part of the DC metro area Street Smart campaign, and is aimed at improving pedestrian safety. According to the BikeWashington listserv, they were already handing out warnings (to cyclists, of course) at the Lynn St. crossing on Lee Highway.  I sat through a presentation about this program last week (at a meeting of the Arlington Bicycle Advisory Committee (ABAC)), and thought I’d pass along some of what I learned.

As I understand it, the campaign is scheduled to run from March 3rd through 29th. A 2-3 man ACPD team is going to spend the month moving amongst various Arlington locations, issuing warnings and (presumably) some tickets. The presenting officer emphasized that it was primarily an education campaign, and that increasing the number of tickets written was not a goal of the campaign. Police will be handing out “Safety Tips” cards (available here in English and Spanish, among other languages) and generally reminding citizens of the right-of-way rules governing pedestrians, cyclists, and vehicles. The officer also indicated that they’d be running “crosswalk stings” (tho’ he did seem to immediately regret that phrasing, in light of his earlier claim that it wasn’t about ticketing).  Apparently the plan is to set out an orange cone in the roadway, and if a car fails to stop for a pedestrian who has started out in the roadway *before* the car passed the orange cone, a ticket will be issued. We’ll see how that goes. Trivia: an Arlington jaywalking ticket will cost you $5. Plus $61 in court costs, if you contest it and lose.

The presentation also included a portion on the most dangerous intersections in Arlington County. I’m going to try and get a copy of those slides and post them there, as they confirm what most of us in Arlington already know – that you ought to be extra careful in the area around Ballston Mall, crossing Glebe Rd through Buckingham, and in the Rosslyn circle.  And  be extra careful crossing Jeff Davis in Crystal City.  Specifically, from 2005 to 2007, the seven most dangerous pedestrian intersections in Arlington County were:

2300 Jefferson Davis Hwy – 5 accidents
900 S Glebe Rd – 3 accidents
1500 S George Mason Dr – 3 accidents
500 N Glebe Rd – 3 accidents
600 N Glebe Rd- 3 accidents
4200 Wilson Blvd – 3 accidents
1800 N Moore St – 3 accidents

Other Arlington stats of interest included the number of cycling-related accidents and injuries over the past three years:

2005 38 accidents, 34 injuries
2006 43 accidents, 49 injuries
2007 38 accidents, 37 injuries

The last cycling-related fatality was in 2005. Accidents, as one might expect, occur more frequently during rush hour(s) traffic.  The rest of the presentation appeared to have been modified from the same one DC’s MPD put together (preserving some of the same bits of wisdom like characterizing cyclists as “anti-authoritarian”).  All in all, I did get the idea that ACPD is genuinely trying to improve the state of affairs for Arlington’s pedestrians and cyclists, and I applaud them for that.  So in that spirit, I’ll leave my concerns for another entry on what I learned at the ABAC meeting.

The New $3 Bill

Behold the new $3 bill.

(Via Superfrenchie, whom you should be reading) 

The Wire Finale

Same as it ever was.

Three Cheers for Gov. Brian Schweizter

Now, I’m very clear that the good Governor of Montana and I don’t line up on every political issue.  But I’ll tell you what – I’m foursquare behind his style (and the Real ID issue):

“Well, we’re putting up with the Federal government on so many fronts, and nearly every month, they come out with another harebrained scheme – an unfunded mandate, to tell us that our life is going to be better if we’ll just buckle under on some other kind of rule or regulation, and we usually just play along for a while and we ignore them for as long as we can, and we try not to bring it to a head, and if it comes to a head, we’ve found that it’s best to just tell them to  . . . go to hell.”

[  . . . ]

“You give me a half a dozen high school students and a Kinko’s, and I’ll show you a birth certificate that looks very very real.”

[ . . . ]

“So that everyone understands, the Montana legislature passed a bill that instructs the Governor and the Attorney General not to implement any provisions of the Real ID [Act], and this is the only thing that I know of that has united the farthest Left to the farthest Right in Montana politics. ”

[ . . . ]

From the interviewer:  “Well Governor Schweitzer, what happens in May [Real ID Act “deadline” for state compliance with Real ID Act] if somebody from your state wants to get on a commercial flight?”

Gov. Schweitzer: “They’re gonna show them their Montana driver’s license and they’re gonna get on that commercial flight and nothing’s gonna happen.”

Interviewer: “But that’s supposed to be the deadline.”

Gov. Schweitzer:”Blah, blah, blah, “supposed to be the deadline.”  There’s nothing in the Constitution that tells Homeland Security that they’re supposed to do this so they must do this.”

Check out the rest of the NPR All Things Considered interview.

Page 3 of 4

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén