Markos takes an asute observation by Theda Skocpol:
Obama is, sadly, much to blame for giving the Republicans so much leverage. He defined the challenge as bipartisanship not saving the U.S. economy.
And runs with it:
What have we seen the last few weeks? Democrats caving to GOP demands and inserting useless tax cut provisions to appease them. Then they vote en masse against the stimulus in the House. Meanwhile, Obama hands yet another cabinet post to yet another Republican, this one a right-wing small-government ideologue who voted to eliminate the Commerce Department he will now head just a few short years ago. Then he gives a schizophrenic acceptance speech where he thanks New Hampshire’s governor for caving to his demands for a GOP replacement for his seat, while at the same time arguing that it’s time to get past “partisanship”. Oh, then he punches Obama in the face by denying him a critical cloture vote on the Senate version of the stimulus bill.
[ . . . ]
During the Bush years, the best interests of our country took a back seat to the GOP’s failed ideology. Right now, it looks like the best interests of our country are taking a back seat to the failed ideology of “bipartisanship”.
It would be nice if, for once, people actually looked at what was best for our country.
Quite.  I recommend hitting the first link for the rest of Skocpol’s comments. The bipartisan schtick that Obama has is one of the reasons I was skeptical of him in the primaries – I worried that he’d let it get in the way of good public policy. As the election moved on, and right after it, I thought that maybe I was mistaken about that.  I’m not too far away from moving firmly back to my skepticism.