That’s what John Aravosis says on his post noting Elizabeth Edward’s support of gay marriage. While I’m not sure I entirely agree with his predictions, I think Aravosis makes some excellent points when he says:
I want my civil rights, I don’t want to be on the receiving end of constant triangulation. Mrs. Edwards will be a force for good, at least as it concerns the civil and human rights of gay and lesbian Americans. As much as I like the man, I can’t say the same about Mr. Clinton. He’s going to be advising Hillary to throw us under the bus. That doesn’t mean Hillary will, but her top two advisers have a history of legislative gay-bashing for political gain. That’s of legitimate concern.
For a number of reasons, I don’t think Bill Clinton would urge repeating his appalling DOMA behavior. That said, I like Elizabeth Edwards more than any of the 2008 spouses (and many of the candidates themselves).
Vivian J. Paige
I was impressed that Elizabeth Edwards spoke out on this. It’s unusual for a spouse to express an opinion different from that of the candidate.
MB
I’m a big Elizabeth Edwards fan. I wish I could get more excited about her husband, but . . . it’s just not happening. And I’m not entirely sure why.
guppy
I feel the same way. In my case, I’m pretty sure it’s not hair-competitiveness, so maybe there really is something about him. Maybe he’ll dazzle us in the upcoming months, though. I don’t actually care how he (or any candidate) feels about gay marriage personally, you know. I would even be dazzled if he came out in favor of equal rights DESPITE his personal discomfort. I might even be MORE dazzled that way.
MB
Ignoring your petty jealousy for the time being, I’ll say that you’ve offered a formulation that could offer a winning path for some politicians.