Politics, open government, and safe streets. And the constant incursion of cycling.

Category: Policy Page 30 of 35

Bush and Cheney Set Standard for Acceptable Language

Okay, the title of this post isn’t really accurate at all. But lord, is this funny. In rejecting the FCC’s new enthusiasm for fining TV stations for broadcasting even a brief and unplanned use of an expletive, the Court of Appeals:

Adopt[ed] an argument made by lawyers for NBC, [and] cited examples in which Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney had used the same language that would be penalized under the policy. Mr. Bush was caught on videotape last July using a common vulgarity that the commission finds objectionable in a conversation with Prime Minister Tony Blair of Britain. Three years ago, Mr. Cheney was widely reported to have muttered an angry obscene version of “get lost” to Senator Patrick Leahy on the floor of the United States Senate.

Fucking brilliant.

Keeping Pressure on the Democrats

“Poll Shows Opposition to Iraq War at All Time High” – that’s the headline at NYTimes.com, at the moment.  And yet we have the Democratic leadership caving to the White House on the matter of withdrawal deadlines.  I know that it takes a while to get over being the minority party, but it’s about @)(@!@! time the Democrats shake it off and start delivering.  And I don’t want to hear a goddamn thing about being afraid that anyone will look like they’re not “supporting the troops.”

No one with two brain cells to rub together can make a cogent argument for the proposition that setting a hard withdrawal date is somehow failing to “support the troops.”  Sure, you can say that it’s failing to support the President, the fantasies of PNAC, or the bloodlust of the remaining sliver of the population that supports President Bush.  But it is NOT failing to “support the troops” (if you need examples of failing to support the troops, take a look at the Bush budget position on military pay or veterans benefits).  The Democratic leadership needs to start acting as if they understand this reality, and if they don’t, they’ll get absolutely no sympathy (or contributions or support) from me when they start paying a political price for it.

Cryptome Shutting Down?

Via Slashdot, I see that Verio recently sent Cryptome.org a notice informing the owner that Verio will no longer provide hosting services as of this Friday. What is Cryptome, and why should you care? Cryptome is perhaps the most impressive individual effort at plugging the “memory hole” that has ever existed.* In Cryptome’s own words:

Cryptome welcomes documents for publication that are prohibited by governments worldwide, in particular material on freedom of expression, privacy, cryptology, dual-use technologies, national security, intelligence, and secret governance — open, secret and classified documents — but not limited to those.

As you might imagine, this has annoyed not just the US government, but governments around the world. I’m near-fanatical when it comes to the idea that transparency is essential to good government, and I think James Young (who runs Cryptome) has done important work in advancing that idea. So getting this notice of shut down from Verio – with no explanation beyond a claim that Cryptome is violating its Acceptable Use Policy – is troubling. Verio, which has otherwise been an excellent host for Cryptome, appears to be unwilling to explain the reasons behind terminating this relationship. Mr. Young speculates:

It may be wondered if Verio was threatened by an undisclosable means, say by an National Security Letter or by a confidential legal document or by a novel attack not yet aired.

I should hope not. But that appears to be the most likely explanation.  I’d quite like to see more on what happened.

*I’m not absolutely certain, but I think Cryptome may be the first online effort I’ve ever donated to.

Reminder to Sen. Webb: You Can’t Carry in DC

As this Washington Post article explains, it’s legal for Senators/Representatives (and their designees) to carry a gun in the Capitol.  However, it is not legal to carry that gun anywhere in the District.  I understand Sen. Webb’s demurring on answering on whether he’s carried a gun in the District in the past (even if it was with some incredibly lame invocation of 9/11).  He may need to be reminded, though, that he’s not above the law – he has no business carrying a gun from Virginia to the Capitol on a daily basis.  It’s against the law, and it would get me, you, and pretty much anyone else arrested.   Don’t like it?  Fine, work with the District to rework the law.  But until then, respect it.

Action: Support the Bicycle Commuters Benefits Act of 2007

Congress is currently considering the Bicycle Commuters Benefits Act of 2007 (S. 858 in the Senate, and H.R. 1498 in the House), which if enacted, would permit employers to extend the same benefits to bicycle commuters that they presently extend to drivers and mass transit users. The League of American Bicyclists explains it:

The [Bicycle Commuters Benefits Act] would extend the transportation fringe benefit, currently available to transit users and car drivers, to bicycle commuters. The legislation would provide a tax benefit to employers who offer cash reimbursements to an employee who commutes by bicycle, while helping defray the costs of commuting for the bicyclist.

This is a great idea, and deserves the bipartisan support it’s getting. It still needs your support to push it to through, though. Please click here for help in writing your Senator and Represenative to urge them to support the bill.

Brzezinski: Terrorized by “War on Terror”

Former National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski has a piece worth reading in the Washington Post today.  When I first read it, I was often thinking – “well this is stating the obvious.”  But then I remember that stating the obvious hasn’t been such a common thing in places like the Washington Post for years now.  In fact, I’d rather like to see more of this.  A few key points from the article:

The “war on terror” has created a culture of fear in America.

[ . . . ]

The damage these three words have done — a classic self-inflicted wound — is infinitely greater than any wild dreams entertained by the fanatical perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks when they were plotting against us in distant Afghan caves. The phrase itself is meaningless. It defines neither a geographic context nor our presumed enemies. Terrorism is not an enemy but a technique of warfare — political intimidation through the killing of unarmed non-combatants.

[ . . . ]

Constant reference to a “war on terror” did accomplish one major objective: It stimulated the emergence of a culture of fear. Fear obscures reason, intensifies emotions and makes it easier for demagogic politicians to mobilize the public on behalf of the policies they want to pursue.

[ . . . ]

That is the result of five years of almost continuous national brainwashing on the subject of terror, quite unlike the more muted reactions of several other nations (Britain, Spain, Italy, Germany, Japan, to mention just a few) that also have suffered painful terrorist acts.

[ . . . ]

Such fear-mongering, reinforced by security entrepreneurs, the mass media and the entertainment industry, generates its own momentum. The terror entrepreneurs, usually described as experts on terrorism, are necessarily engaged in competition to justify their existence. Hence their task is to convince the public that it faces new threats.

Brzezinski goes on to explore various examples of how this happens,  and it’s well worth reading the whole.  And then he closes with this:

Where is the U.S. leader ready to say, “Enough of this hysteria, stop this paranoia”? Even in the face of future terrorist attacks, the likelihood of which cannot be denied, let us show some sense. Let us be true to our traditions.

Yes.  Those traditions we used to honor as American values.

Working hard for your ISP, are you?

Via Dave Farber’s IP list:

[T]he CEO of Compete Inc. revealed that ISPs happily sell clickstream data — and that it’s a big business. They don’t sell your name — just your clicks — but the clicks are tied to you as a specific user (User 1, User 2, etc.).

How much are your clicks worth? About 40 cents a month per user (per customer)… and the Compete CEO estimates that there are 10-12 big buyers of this data. In other words, your ISP is probably making about $5 a month ($60 a year) off your clickstreams.

This is news to me, and I like to think of myself as someone who pays attention to these things. More here.

Perhaps there’s hope for VA Republicans

Get this: today, an elected Virginia Republican said something making national news, and it wasn’t hate-filled or embarrassing!

In all seriousness, though, I’m glad to see Sen. Warner standing up for what’s right:

I respectfully but strongly disagree with the chairman’s view that homosexuality is immoral.

Now, this doesn’t mean I expect him to start helping Rep. Meehan get this policy changed, but it’s a wonderfully refreshing change from what we’ve come to expect from his side of the aisle. Here’s hoping for more.

Also, check out Jeff Huber’s take on the matter. He’s retired Navy, and knows a thing or two about the matter at hand.

Putting the Public in Public Hearings

Carl Malamud‘s recent work at finding a way to ensure that video of all open proceedings at the Capitol is freely available is a fantastic example of active citizenship. He’s just given Speaker Pelosi a report on his efforts, which I quite recommend as reading to anyone with even a passing interest in the mechanics of making public proceedings available to the public. For the rest of you, though, it can be summed up as this:

Based on 25 years of experience in the field of computer networking and a 2-year investigation of this specific issue, I have absolutely no doubt that it is technically and financially feasible for the U.S. Congress to provide a permanent broadcast-quality video record of proceedings and hearings for download on the Internet. Technically speaking, this is a “no-brainer.” This is simply a matter of will.

Make sure your Representatives put their will behind this effort.

Viacom Sues Google for $1B

Looks like I got my wish. I’d much prefer seeing this in the news to where they’re going to bury Britney’s hair, anyway.

Page 30 of 35

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén