when you get all your facts from the Internets?
Category: Politics Page 6 of 73
Woody’s still exactly right:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxiMrvDbq3s[/youtube]
Love me some Billy Bragg:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1O38QCGk1k[/youtube]
And Billy Bragg will be voting Lib Dem. Â What has become of you, Labour?
He’s just doing it just to screw with us, now. Has to be. And I just love that the offensive part is the exposed breast, and not standing on top of a bloody body:
Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli apparently isn’t fond of wardrobe malfunctions, even when Virginia’s state seal is involved.
The seal depicts the Roman goddess Virtus, or virtue, wearing a blue tunic draped over one shoulder, her left breast exposed. But on the new lapel pins Cuccinelli recently handed out to his staff, Virtus’ bosom is covered by an armored breastplate.
What’s there to say? Nothing, really. The man is a clown, and he’ll keep the clown show going for another 3 years. And then to the governor’s mansion, right?
So, I’d seen bits and pieces about a silly scheme supported by Sens. Schumer and Graham to create some sort of national worker ID card, but I didn’t think such a bad idea would make it into legislation. Well, it’s apparently part of the immigration reform package:
The national ID program would be titled the Believe System, an acronym for Biometric Enrollment, Locally stored Information and Electronic Verification of Employment. It would require all workers across the nation to carry a card with a digital encryption key that would have to match work authorization databases.
“The cardholder’s identity will be verified by matching the biometric identifier stored within the microprocessing chip on the card to the identifier provided by the cardholder that shall be read by the scanner used by the employer,†states the Democratic legislative proposal.
The American Civil Liberties Union, a civil liberties defender often aligned with the Democratic Party, wasted no time in blasting the plan.
John Cole reacts appropriately:
Apparently they think the outcry over the Arizona “SHOW YOUR PAPERS†bill is that it will only be applied to Hispanics. Polls pretty clearly demonstrate that half the country has no problem with the Arizona bill because it will not affect them- it only is an inconvenience for “others†(meaning brown people). But start talking about a national id with biometric data that everyone has to be issued, and you will think the death panels and health care reform debate were a walk in the park.
And I’m not even talking about the actual merits and downsides to the id card. I’m talking about the freak-out that will be inevitable, some of which I will probably even agree with. This is just stunningly tone deaf.
I’ve talked about the merits (or lack thereof) of national ID cards. What an incredibly stupid move.
The Washington Examiner brings us a headline for the ages, in this photo snapped by Twitter user Maimonides.
The headline leads to this story by Julie Mason, which captures the narrative I spotlighted yesterday — conservative shock and horror at President Obama’s blunt video message asking his less electorally reliable coalition of blacks, Hispanics and young people to vote in 2010.
Don’t worry too much, White Guys – Bob McDonnell should be riding to your rescue soon!
Among the multitude of reasons I’d never make it in the big leagues of political commentary these days is my inability to look you in the eye and lie:
The Gov. Bob McDonnell Clown Show continues:
On Saturday, the Washington Post reported that McDonnell was instituting steeper re-enfranchisement requirements for formerly incarcerated people seeking to get back their voting rights. The new restrictions, which would have added a requirement that applicants submit an essay detailing their “contributions to society” since their release, would amount to a de facto literacy test for some of the least educated people in the state, as Chris Cassidy points out.
Disappointing, but entirely unsurprising. Â And now he’s backing off, in a way that – well, let’s just say I’m having a hard time believing anything coming out of the Governor’s office:
After taking heat from local black legislators and civil rights leaders, McDonnell now appears to be backing off, saying that the whole thing was merely a “draft proposal,” which doesn’t explain why 200 people were sent letters saying they had to write an essay to the governor to get their voting rights back, or why one of his spokespersons defended the new process at the time as “an opportunity, not an obstacle.”
Oh, riiiight. Â A draft proposal. Â Maybe he was just trying to enlist the editorial talents of the 200 folks that got the letters? Â Public outreach, right?
At the suggestion of Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell, I’m taking another back at that institution that seems to form the basis of so much of Virginia’s politics and identity – the Confederacy.  So, what was the Confederacy all about?  Well, maybe Alexander Stephens, Vice President of that little experiment, can tell us a little.  Here’s his Cornerstone Speech, which laid out the new constitution of the Confederacy, including:
But not to be tedious in enumerating the numerous changes for the better, allow me to allude to one other though last, not least. The new constitution has put at rest, forever, all the agitating questions relating to our peculiar institution African slavery as it exists amongst us the proper status of the negro in our form of civilization. This was the immediate cause of the late rupture and present revolution. Â Jefferson in his forecast, had anticipated this, as the “rock upon which the old Union would split.” He was right. What was conjecture with him, is now a realized fact. But whether he fully comprehended the great truth upon which that rock stood and stands, may be doubted. The prevailing ideas entertained by him and most of the leading statesmen at the time of the formation of the old constitution, were that the enslavement of the African was in violation of the laws of nature; that it was wrong in principle, socially, morally, and politically. It was an evil they knew not well how to deal with, but the general opinion of the men of that day was that, somehow or other in the order of Providence, the institution would be evanescent and pass away. This idea, though not incorporated in the constitution, was the prevailing idea at that time. The constitution, it is true, secured every essential guarantee to the institution while it should last, and hence no argument can be justly urged against the constitutional guarantees thus secured, because of the common sentiment of the day. Those ideas, however, were fundamentally wrong. They rested upon the assumption of the equality of races. This was an error. It was a sandy foundation, and the government built upon it fell when the “storm came and the wind blew.”
Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; its foundations are laid, its corner- stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth.
You should, as the saying goes, read the whole thing.  You might find yourself quite struck between the rhetorical similarities between Stephens and certain popular movements today.  You should also check out the Texas Declaration of Secession, with gems like:
In all the non-slave-holding States, in violation of that good faith and comity which should exist between entirely distinct nations, the people have formed themselves into a great sectional party, now strong enough in numbers to control the affairs of each of those States, based upon an unnatural feeling of hostility to these Southern States and their beneficent and patriarchal system of African slavery, proclaiming the debasing doctrine of equality of all men, irrespective of race or color– a doctrine at war with nature, in opposition to the experience of mankind, and in violation of the plainest revelations of Divine Law. They demand the abolition of negro slavery throughout the confederacy, the recognition of political equality between the white and negro races, and avow their determination to press on their crusade against us, so long as a negro slave remains in these States.
Heritage, not hate, y’all!
Finally, for fun, my most commented upon post ever – The Proper Way to Hang a Confederate Flag
Here’s a very good summary of the various differences between the House and Senate HCR bills, and how they were sorted out. I didn’t realize that undocumented immigrants were prohibited from buying (unsubsidized) insurance through the exchanges. Insistence on its inclusion just exposes the lie that this is about costs. Rather, it’s about being spiteful (a guiding philosophy for many, to be sure). The entire thing is worth a read, especially in light of all the lies that are being passed around (and will continue to be, even after this is passed and we see that none of the previous lies were true).
In all honestly, I didn’t really expect that Del. Patrick Hope (the recent winner in my local delegate contest) would be my kind of Democrat. Â In his campaign, he struck me as too soft-spoken and willing to accomodate. Â Well, here’s to hoping he keeps proving me wrong:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RMPySY7Vdc[/youtube]