Politics, open government, and safe streets. And the constant incursion of cycling.

Category: Politics Page 64 of 73

An Elected Republican Does Something Decent

Every once in a while, I’m pleasantly surprised by an elected Republican. Rep. Tom Davis on DC voting rights, or Gov. George Ryan on the death penalty, come to mind. This time, Florida Gov. Charlie Crist is delivering:

Florida officials will automatically begin the [voting] rights-restoration process for felons when they finish their sentences.

[ . . . ]

The change was urged by Republican Gov. Charlie Crist. His predecessor, Jeb Bush, had long opposed changing the ban.

“I believe in simple human justice and that, when somebody has paid their debt to society, it is paid in full,” Crist said Thursday. “There’s a time to move on, a time to give them an opportunity to have redemption, to have a chance to become productive citizens again.”

Good job, Governor.

It’s not enough, Matthew Dowd.

Josh Marshall links to this NYT piece, saying that “Matthew Dowd confesses and repents.” Matthew Dowd helped bring Bush from Texas to the White House in 2000, and was the Bush’s chief campaign strategist in 2004.

Looking back, Mr. Dowd now says his faith in Mr. Bush was misplaced.

[ . . . ]

[H]is disappointment in Mr. Bush’s presidency is so great that he feels a sense of duty to go public given his role in helping Mr. Bush gain and keep power.

Well, that’s a start.  The article goes through a number of instances which gave Dowd pause about Bush – Katrina, Abu Ghraib, and the deployment of his own son to Iraq.  Apparently, it took these things to make clear to him what an almost majority (if not a majority) of the American public knew *before* 2004 – that George W. Bush is the biggest disaster that has ever hit American shores.  And Matthew Dowd contributed greatly not only to bringing that disaster here, but prolonging it.  It seems he’s beginning to recognize the consequences of that.  So what’s he going to do?

[H]e said [of the 2008 cycle], “I wouldn’t be surprised if I wasn’t walking around in Africa or South America doing something that was like mission work.”

He added, “I do feel a calling of trying to re-establish a level of gentleness in the world.”

He owes the world a hell of a lot more than that, but perhaps that’s a start.  You’ve done enormous damage to *this* country, Matthew Dowd.  You owe it much.  Between now and 2008, you can start to put a dent in that debt.  Do it.

“Vote NO on Bob Marshall” Fundraiser for Bruce Roemmelt

From an Arlington Young Democrats/Virginia Partisans email:

When: Thursday, March 29 at 5:30PM

Where: Rhodeside Grill
1836 Wilson Boulevard (2 blocks from the Court House metro)
Arlington, VA VA 22203
703-867-5070

Event Description:

Arlington Young Democrats and Virginia Partisans Gay & Lesbian Democratic Club are co-hosting a fundraiser for Bruce Roemmelt, who is running for the Prince William County delegate seat held by vulnerable right-wing Republican Bob Marshall, who co-sponsored last year’s anti-gay marriage amendment and desperately needs us to send him to an early retirement. Heavy appetizers will be served.

Cost:

* Arlington Young Dems: $20
* Bruce Backer: $40
* Bruce Better Backer: $75
* Bruce Best Backer: $100 and beyond.

I won’t be able to make it, but my $ definitely will.

Brzezinski: Terrorized by “War on Terror”

Former National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski has a piece worth reading in the Washington Post today.  When I first read it, I was often thinking – “well this is stating the obvious.”  But then I remember that stating the obvious hasn’t been such a common thing in places like the Washington Post for years now.  In fact, I’d rather like to see more of this.  A few key points from the article:

The “war on terror” has created a culture of fear in America.

[ . . . ]

The damage these three words have done — a classic self-inflicted wound — is infinitely greater than any wild dreams entertained by the fanatical perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks when they were plotting against us in distant Afghan caves. The phrase itself is meaningless. It defines neither a geographic context nor our presumed enemies. Terrorism is not an enemy but a technique of warfare — political intimidation through the killing of unarmed non-combatants.

[ . . . ]

Constant reference to a “war on terror” did accomplish one major objective: It stimulated the emergence of a culture of fear. Fear obscures reason, intensifies emotions and makes it easier for demagogic politicians to mobilize the public on behalf of the policies they want to pursue.

[ . . . ]

That is the result of five years of almost continuous national brainwashing on the subject of terror, quite unlike the more muted reactions of several other nations (Britain, Spain, Italy, Germany, Japan, to mention just a few) that also have suffered painful terrorist acts.

[ . . . ]

Such fear-mongering, reinforced by security entrepreneurs, the mass media and the entertainment industry, generates its own momentum. The terror entrepreneurs, usually described as experts on terrorism, are necessarily engaged in competition to justify their existence. Hence their task is to convince the public that it faces new threats.

Brzezinski goes on to explore various examples of how this happens,  and it’s well worth reading the whole.  And then he closes with this:

Where is the U.S. leader ready to say, “Enough of this hysteria, stop this paranoia”? Even in the face of future terrorist attacks, the likelihood of which cannot be denied, let us show some sense. Let us be true to our traditions.

Yes.  Those traditions we used to honor as American values.

Administration Lies: What’s Different This Time

There’s not much to say about the scandal of the 7 fired US Attorneys that hasn’t already been said (especially by the top notch operation over at TPM Muckraker). And really, it hasn’t excited me all that much, because it’s simply a rehash of the same thing the Bush Administration has served us over and over and over again. There’s nothing new here. Well, except for one very important thing. First, though, let’s review the standard elements of nearly every Bush scandal:

  1. Action taken for a nakedly political motivation, public interest and established practice be damned
  2. Action noted online and analyzed a bit, only to be generally ignored by press
  3. Online reporters connect a few more dots, prompting some attention by non-WP/NYT press and a few members of Congress
  4. Add some additional percolation time
  5. Democratic Member(s) of Congress takes on the issue and demands an answer from the Administration
  6. Administration brushes it off/stonewalls at first, and then lies when pressed
  7. Information all but proving the lie becomes public

These are the ingredients of almost every Bush administration scandal we’ve seen. NSA wiretapping, intelligence reporting, “thwarted terrorist plots” – you name it, they’ve all pretty much followed the same script, which then culminates in:

    8. Democrats are denounced as partisan/undermining security, and it blows over with the help of a compliant press.

But that doesn’t seem to be happening this time, does it? In fact, we’re witnessing things we’ve not seen before – Republican senators calling for a resignation and mainstream press appears to be working hard on the story. So what’s different? I really don’t think it’s the Democratic control of Congress.

Rather, it’s that this failing of Bush’s isn’t tied to a policy that the Republicans and mainstream press have bound themselves to in public. And that gives Republicans an opening that they’re taking. Since November, Republicans wanting a future in elected office have been looking for a way to put space between themselves and this administration. But they’ve not been willing to do it on an issue that would open themselves to the same charges they’ve spent the past five years leveling. By jumping on Gonzales now – on an issue that they’ve never had a (public) hand in – they’re creating that space between themselves and the administration without having to face the fact that they’ve never had a problem with administration lies and purely political actions before. And they still leave the security/patriotism horse ready in the stable, in case they need to ride it again (and they will).

Voter ID Requirements: Some Data

Voter ID requirements certainly get people excited. Democrats (mostly) fight them, arguing that they reduce access to the polls. Republicans fight for them, under the guise of reducing voter fraud. I’m coming to understand, however, that neither side really has any solid data to back their claims and theories up. So this Slate story covering the findings of a university consortium study on the matter (the Cooperative Congressional Election Study) makes for interesting reading. Some specific findings:

  • half of the survey respondents said they were required to present photo ID, even though in 2006 the laws in only Indiana and Florida required this of all voters
  • poll workers asked for such identification very frequently in the South (65 percent) and rarely in the Northeast (22 percent)
  • just 23 people in the entire sample—less than one-tenth of 1 percent of reported voters—said that they were asked for photo identification and were then not allowed to vote
  • African-Americans were asked to present photo ID more often than whites—54 percent of the time versus 46 percent

These are all interesting – if somewhat inconclusive – findings, and I recommend the whole article (and hey, Waldo, maybe you can put that Edward Tufte education to good use!). The author really draws only one conclusion at the end, one my experience as a volunteer voter protection attorney bears out:

To return to the finding that half of survey respondents said they were required to present photo ID despite the rarity of relevant state laws, this result is instructive because of what it suggests about how rules are not followed. Both sides of the voter-fraud debate assume that registration requirements matter because poll workers will apply them as instructed. In truth, this country continues to rely on barely trained volunteers to administer the actual process of voting. Any plan to combat fraud or increase access, let alone upgrade voting technology, must take into account that it will be administered largely by amateurs.

Something to consider next time we engage each other on this subject.

Portraits in Cravenness: John McCain

A simple question:

“Should U.S. taxpayer money go to places like Africa to fund contraception to prevent AIDS?”

Apparently, it’s a question John McCain couldn’t answer.

Popular Support for the Rule of Law . . . in Pakistan

It seems that things are heating up in Pakistan. Earlier this month, Gen. Pervez Musharraf suspended the Chief Justice of Pakistan’s Supreme Court, ostensibly for “misuse of authority.” However, as noted in this BBC piece, the Chief Justice has “a reputation for taking a firm line against government misdemeanours and human rights abuses.” As news of the Chief Justice’s removal spread, so did protests. Today, it was reported that:

Police in the Pakistani capital Islamabad on Friday used tear gas to clear the offices of the private Geo news channel as it broadcast live footage of clashes with protesters.

Windows were smashed in the lobby as officers tried to interrupt transmission of violent scenes near the Supreme Court, where suspended chief justice Iftikhar Chaudhry stood before a panel of judges over allegations of misuse of office.

Undoubtedly, some of the motivation behind the protests is political. Nawaz Sharif (former prime minister, deposed by Musharraf) and Benazir Bhutto (also former prime minister, lost (in a questionable election) to Sharif) are adept at stirring protests into action when it benefits them. But the discontent that has erupted in response to the Chief Justice’s removal seems to go far beyond business as usual. As the Washington Post reports:

“Nothing like this has happened during the time Musharraf has been in power,” said Ayaz Amir, a columnist for the English-language Dawn newspaper. “This has shaken the country. It has shaken the government. This is the most serious situation Musharraf has faced, and it has all the potential of getting out of hand and turning into something bigger.”

It may be strange to think of Pakistan – a country that generally welcomed its military dictator when he first took over – as being all that concerned with the rule of law. But that may well be what we have here.

Perhaps there’s hope for VA Republicans

Get this: today, an elected Virginia Republican said something making national news, and it wasn’t hate-filled or embarrassing!

In all seriousness, though, I’m glad to see Sen. Warner standing up for what’s right:

I respectfully but strongly disagree with the chairman’s view that homosexuality is immoral.

Now, this doesn’t mean I expect him to start helping Rep. Meehan get this policy changed, but it’s a wonderfully refreshing change from what we’ve come to expect from his side of the aisle. Here’s hoping for more.

Also, check out Jeff Huber’s take on the matter. He’s retired Navy, and knows a thing or two about the matter at hand.

Putting the Public in Public Hearings

Carl Malamud‘s recent work at finding a way to ensure that video of all open proceedings at the Capitol is freely available is a fantastic example of active citizenship. He’s just given Speaker Pelosi a report on his efforts, which I quite recommend as reading to anyone with even a passing interest in the mechanics of making public proceedings available to the public. For the rest of you, though, it can be summed up as this:

Based on 25 years of experience in the field of computer networking and a 2-year investigation of this specific issue, I have absolutely no doubt that it is technically and financially feasible for the U.S. Congress to provide a permanent broadcast-quality video record of proceedings and hearings for download on the Internet. Technically speaking, this is a “no-brainer.” This is simply a matter of will.

Make sure your Representatives put their will behind this effort.

Page 64 of 73

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén