Politics, open government, and safe streets. And the constant incursion of cycling.

Category: Society Page 38 of 69

18 Days Is a Long Time

Yes, 100,000 people in St. Louis.  Yes, $150,000,000 in September.  But there are still 18 days to go.  Do not let up.  Reed Hunt reminds:

Only if we win will McCain and Palin have to cope with the reputations they will have earned. If they win, they get to write the history.

Democrats need to knock on every door in those key states; respond to every charge, no matter how crazy, in every media forum that can be found; stay on the air; stay on the offense. And remember the essential voters in those key states won’t finally decide until the weekend before that Tuesday.

Prop 8: I’m Not Kidding About These Bigots

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DcVI0-xESCQ[/youtube]

At this point, donations to this are far more effective than donations to the Obama campaign.   More info here.

10:15/Saturday Night: Opus’ Mad World

Two things go perfectly together, tonight.  First, this interview with Berkeley Breathed, on bringing Opus to an end (killing him?!):

Breathed says it’s the anger that led him to close the book on “Opus,” that the increasingly nasty political climate has made it too difficult to keep his strip from drifting into darkness. Breathed has described his work as a hybrid of “Peanuts” creator Charles Schulz’s gentle humor and Michael Moore’s crusading social justice. Perhaps losing touch with his inner Charlie Brown, Breathed has said that “a mad penguin, like a mad cartoonist, isn’t very lovable,” and wants Opus to take his final bow before bitterness changes him forever.

And yes, it’s a repeat, but apt:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0G9vDKcdLg[/youtube]

Respect

I would never, in a million years, have imagined this possible:

That’s 100,000 people who went through a good amount of time and effort in order to participate in the American political process.  It’s also a suggestion that I still have much to learn about this country, and the people in it.  And I’m thrilled to be reminded of that like this.

The End of Libertarianism?

Jacob Weisberg, writing in Slate:

[T]he libertarian apologetics fall wildly short of providing any convincing explanation for what went wrong. The argument as a whole is reminiscent of wearying dorm-room debates that took place circa 1989 about whether the fall of the Soviet bloc demonstrated the failure of communism. Academic Marxists were never going to be convinced that anything that happened in the real world could invalidate their belief system. Utopians of the right, libertarians are just as convinced that their ideas have yet to be tried, and that they would work beautifully if we could only just have a do-over of human history. Like all true ideologues, they find a way to interpret mounting evidence of error as proof that they were right all along.

To which the rest of us can only respond, Haven’t you people done enough harm already?

Heh.  Here’s the rest.

(And with that, I’m going back to my libertarian comment system ways, and turning off the moderation.  The spam seems to have abated.  However, I’m heading off for the day, so if there’s an avalanche of it . . .)

I Did Not Have Herbivorous Relations With . . . That Plant.

Here’s a political attack that never occurred to me:

Republican gubernatorial candidate Roy Brown this week accused Democrats of spreading a false rumor that he is a vegetarian in this meat-loving state.

“I am not and have never been a vegetarian,” Brown said.

“I am disgusted by the baseless allegation that I am a vegetarian and that my personal eating habits should somehow be construed as opposed to the economic interests of Montana’s livestock industry.”

Really?  I mean, I’m no stranger to people’s reactions to vegetarians.  Hell, I might even be able to claim some special familiarity with the Montana political reaction to vegetarians – a couple of years ago, I was at a dinner table next to Sen. Conrad Burns (R-MT).  Some sort of apparently wonderful sirloin steak was the menu for the evening, and when the server brought my plate, I declined and asked for something veg.  It brought comment from the rest of the table (who were mostly the sort of folks one might imagine would want to have dinner with Conrad Burns), but he just briefly looked at me sideways, shrugged his shoulders, and kept on eating.  He’s not exactly the most tolerant fellow in the world, so I figure if it wasn’t a big deal to him, I can’t imagine it’s a big deal to other Montanans.

The Security Theatre Chronicles, Part 374

Jeffery Goldberg has spent the past couple of years demonstrating (for himself, apparently) what an utter joke the TSA’s system has become.  And I’m not just talking about simple little things – like the small blade I usually carry, or the fact that I’ve decided to just leave the liquids in my bag – but things that would make even me think there might be an actual threat:

During one secondary inspection, at O’Hare International Airport in Chicago, I was wearing under my shirt a spectacular, only-in-America device called a “Beerbelly,” a neoprene sling that holds a polyurethane bladder and drinking tube. The Beerbelly, designed originally to sneak alcohol—up to 80 ounces—into football games, can quite obviously be used to sneak up to 80 ounces of liquid through airport security. (The company that manufactures the Beerbelly also makes something called a “Winerack,” a bra that holds up to 25 ounces of booze and is recommended, according to the company’s Web site, for PTA meetings.) My Beerbelly, which fit comfortably over my beer belly, contained two cans’ worth of Bud Light at the time of the inspection. It went undetected. The eight-ounce bottle of water in my carry-on bag, however, was seized by the federal government.

If the Presidential candidates are looking for a budget to cut?  Start at the TSA.  I don’t need someone spending this amount of money to simply (try to) make me feel better.

Got a Problem With Your Cell Coverage? Verizon and AT&T Will Give You a New Cell Tower

Well, they will if your name is Cindy & John McCain, anyway:

Early in 2007, just as her husband launched his presidential bid, Cindy McCain decided to resolve an old problem — the lack of cellular telephone coverage on her remote 15-acre ranch near Sedona, nestled deep in a tree-lined canyon called Hidden Valley.

By the time Sen. John McCain’s presidential bid was in full swing this summer, the ranch had wireless coverage from the two cellular companies most often used by campaign staff — Verizon Wireless and AT&T.

Verizon delivered a portable tower know as a “cell site on wheels” — free of charge — to Cindy McCain’s property in June in response to an online request from Cindy McCain’s staff early last year.

Have you ever tried to get a problem resolved via the Verizon or AT&T websites?  I’m sure you had the exact same experience, didn’t you?  No?  Well, it would help if you chaired the Senate committee overseeing the agency which regulates them, I suppose:

Ethics lawyers said Cindy McCain’s dealings with the wireless companies stand out because Sen. John McCain is a senior member of the Senate Commerce Committee, which oversees the Federal Communications Commission and the telecommunications industry. He has been a leading advocate for industry-backed legislation, fighting regulations and taxes on telecommunications services.

Now, I don’t think there’s anything ethically wrong here, but if McCain was at all interested in putting substance behind his rhetoric, he wouldn’t have accepted this.  It does, however, give a brief glimpse into just how easy life is for people like the McCains.  I suspect it gets incorporated into their general worldview, which shapes their approach to legislation.  I mean, if they can just pick up the phone and have Verizon provide better service, why can’t the rest of us?  No need for the FCC!

Another McCain Change of Convenience: Fair Use and Political Discourse

John McCain, who has never previously missed a chance to play up the importance of the DMCA’s restrictions on public usage, has suffered a bit at the hands of the DMCA.  His ads on YouTube have been the subject of takedown notices from CBS, NBC, and even CBN (the Christian Broadcasting Network).  He’s now complaining about this to YouTube, writing a letter (PDF) that includes:

[O]verreaching copyright claims have resulted in the removal of non-infringing campaign videos from YouTube, thus silencing political speech. Numerous times during the course of the campaign, our advertisements or web videos have been the subject of DMCA takedown notices regarding uses that are clearly privileged under the fair use doctrine. The uses at issue have been the inclusion of fewer than ten seconds of footage from news broadcasts in campaign ads or videos, as a basis for commentary on the issues presented in the news reports, or on the reports themselves. These are paradigmatic examples of fair use…

Finally, something the McCain campaign and I agree on, 100%.  But oh, wait, there’s more:

[W]e believe that it would consume few resources–and provide enormous benefit–for YouTube to commit to a full legal review of all takedown notices on videos posted from accounts controlled by (at least) political candidates and campaigns.

Ah, that’s more like it – McCain first, country second (perhaps McCain’s only reliable principle?).  Fred von Lohmann, an attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, points out:

The obvious problem with this solution? It assumes that YouTube should prioritize the campaigns’ fair use rights, rather than those of the rest of us. That seems precisely backwards, since the most exciting new possibilities on YouTube are for amateur political expression by the voters themselves. After all, the campaigns have no trouble getting the same ads out on television and radio, options not available to most YouTubers.

This isn’t posturing – think about the most effective political videos you’ve seen.  Were any of them produced by a campaign?  I’ll bet they weren’t.  One of the most important political projects to be undertaken in the coming years will be not only to put a halt to – but roll back – IP laws that reach beyond commerce to control political discourse and culture.  Think we can count on McCain’s help when the time comes?

Help Fight Bigotry: Support the No on Prop 8 Campaign

As you may know, California’s constitutional right to marriage is under attack by the usual suspects in the form of a ballot initiative (called Proposition 8).   Vote No on Prop 8You may – like I did, until recently – think that it was a stunt that faced little chance of success.   That, unfortunately, isn’t true.  Big money has come from religious organizations (Mormon church, Knights of Columbus, etc.) and the latest polls have opinion standing 47-42 in favor of banning marriage equality in California.

California ballot initiatives are largely advertising campaign contests, which require an enormous amount of money in those media markets.  The money gap between both sides is substantial (perhaps because so many of us took Prop 8’s defeat for granted).  According to a recent email from MassEquality, “the anti-gay right has raised $25.4 million – that’s 10 million dollars more than our side.”  This has never been – and will not be – a place where I regularly promote donations.  But I’m hoping you’ll consider supporting the Vote No On Prop 8 efforts with a contribution of as little as $5 or with your time phone banking (you can do that from your own home – no need to be in California).  You can learn more about the campaign here.

So many campaigns that we already pour our time and money into can often feel as if they won’t make a much of a difference.  But this is important.  It’s an essential step to preserving one of the biggest steps forward in the pursuit of a more just and decent society.   Please help.

Page 38 of 69

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén