Politics, open government, and safe streets. And the constant incursion of cycling.

Security That Matters

Bruce Schneier has up another essay well worth reading. It doesn’t contain much that he hasn’t already said, but it does a good job of tying things together. And it makes a point I’m afraid is lost on all the Republicans clutching their pearls over the KSM trial:

The best way to help people feel secure is by acting secure around them. Instead of reacting to terrorism with fear, we — and our leaders — need to react with indomitability.

[ . . . ]

By not overreacting, by not responding to movie-plot threats, and by not becoming defensive, we demonstrate the resilience of our society, in our laws, our culture, our freedoms. There is a difference between indomitability and arrogant ‘bring ’em on’ rhetoric. There’s a difference between accepting the inherent risk that comes with a free and open society, and hyping the threats…

[ . . . ]

Despite fearful rhetoric to the contrary, terrorism is not a transcendent threat. A terrorist attack cannot possibly destroy a country’s way of life; it’s only our reaction to that attack that can do that kind of damage.

The whole thing is very much worth your time.

Previous

Sullivan: Still A Sucker

Next

“Columbus go home! Columbus go home!”

5 Comments

  1. CG

    What we really need to worry about is another Japanese sneak attack because Obama bowed to an elderly gentleman with a title.

    I hear they may try to bury a U.S. city with unsold “Hello Kitty” gear.

  2. MB

    Watch for the folks with full shopping bags running and yelling “Sanrio!”, eh?

  3. LFS

    Really, the Republicans?

    http://wcbstv.com/politics/911.trial.paterson.2.1316155.html

    Trying some in US courts and leaving others to the military tribunals looks like a political ploy.

  4. MB

    There’s no pearl-clutching there (cf. Shaddeg, McConnell, et al.). That isn’t to say that it’s unique to Republicans. The House defunding of the attempted Gitmo closure certainly showed that.

    And yes, I agree that some level of politics drove the separation into trials and tribunals. I’d prefer all trials, myself. But if you want to take honest aim at that, then take up the issue with those that authorized the torture in the first place (b/c that’s what I’m fairly sure is being covered up by the tribunals).

  5. LFS

    BTW, 51% of Americans are clutching their pearls:

    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/november_2009/51_oppose_decision_to_try_terrorists_in_new_york_city

    But you probably hit the nail on the head with the torture thing… that’s what this is all about.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén