Politics, open government, and safe streets. And the constant incursion of cycling.

Category: Distribution Page 11 of 15

Using Your Superpower For Good

Cory Doctorow bring us this bit of goodness – librarians waiving fees in exchange for Dance Dance Revolution play. While I’ve got a conflicted relationship with librarians*, I think this is fantastic.

*No, really. Just a few years ago, I was almost forced to deal a mortal blow to a Library of Congress librarian who thought he had to defend the stacks against a dear friend of mine. Because she couldn’t immediately articulate the exact focus of her research. Sonofabitch! But then I remember the librarian who declined to turn my 2nd grade self into my (working in the same school) mother, even though he’d caught me entering terribly obscene answers into the library’s “What Is This?” photo contest.

US Federal Judge Takes Wikileaks.org Down

It’ll be interesting to see how this resolves:

A controversial website that allows whistle-blowers to anonymously post government and corporate documents has been taken offline in the US.

Wikileaks.org, as it is known, was cut off from the internet following a California court ruling, the site says.

The case was brought by a Swiss bank after “several hundred” documents were posted about its offshore activities.

Other versions of the pages, hosted in countries such as Belgium and India, can still be accessed.

Wikileaks, in case you’ve never heard of it, has been gaining profile as the place to put information that someone is trying to keep under cover:

The site was founded in 2006 by dissidents, journalists, mathematicians and technologists from the US, Taiwan, Europe, Australia and South Africa.

It so far claims to have published more than 1.2 million documents.

Here’s a mirror of the Wikileaks site. A bit popular, at the moment.

Update: here’s a list of all the various “cover names” for the Wikileaks site.  Clearly, the court didn’t have the first idea of how these things work.

Hype or Not? Rawstory’s Universal Internet Surveillance Claim

You might have already been sent this Rawstory advance preview of Lawrence Wright’s article on a purported US government plan to “giv[e] the government the authority to examine the content of any e-mail, file transfer or Web search.” The article is slated to appear in this week’s New Yorker (but not online). Within a few minutes of posting to Slashdot, the Rawstory preview showed up on a couple of listservs I’m on and has generally spread far and wide at a rapid clip. I suspect we’ll see a lot more about this in the next few days.

Frankly, I’m skeptical about the central claim. But I’m also curious enough that I just went to a bookstore, a coupe of magazine stands, and a library trying to find the latest New Yorker. No dice, unfortunately. Rawstory has failed to deliver the goods on hyped stories before, and I wouldn’t be surprised if this was a bit of pot stirring here. On the other hand, National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell isn’t a fan of the Fourth Amendment, and we’ve got a fair bit of evidence that NSA has (or has attempted to) engage in “dragnet” surveillance of Internet traffic before. I suppose I really shouldn’t be surprised if they really are planning to expand the infrastructure required for wholesale surveillance. You can be sure to read more about it here when I can put my hands on the article.

On Commenting

I discovered a new dimension to my recent frustration with Google, today.   In addition to being arbitrarily locked out of web mail, site stats, and browser syncing, I’m no longer able to comment on blogs that only permit comments from registered Blogger users.  Like the other items, however, this is more of an inconvenience than a real loss, as I generally don’t participate on sites that require registration to comment.   However, I tried to offer something substantive and useful (an exception, I know) on another site concerning the FCC’s approach to the multiple ownership rules, only to discover that it wouldn’t post because, well, Google hates me (temporarily, I hope).  That’s a real shame, I think.

Registration for comments is cumbersome and time consuming, and it provides yet another vector through which an email address can be lost to the aggressions of spam lists.  I suspect that the proprietors of most sites with registration requirements don’t realize that they’re closing the doors to many would-be commenters.   Further, to the extent that registration requirements are imposed to prevent spam or ban certain people, those can be efficiently handled on the back-end without too much work (ask anyone who uses Akismet, for example).

So what do I like?  Open comments that permit a user to pick her own name, attach a URL (if desired), and aren’t moderated by default.  An option to be notified of future comments on that thread is gravy (which I recently added here, by the way).  This can be one of many identity options in a commenting system including Blogger, OpenID, etc., but it should always be an option.

Who does it right?  Well, most anyone with an open commenting system.  It’s easy to participate at any of these places, because they’ve chosen to offer simple and open commenting.  A good example of a hybrid system is over at the Freewheeling Spirit, where not only do you have the option of simply using your own chosen ID and url, but you can pick from a plethora of existing ID systems that you probably already use (e.g., OpenID, Blogger, Typepad, etc.).  And, for gravy, you can simply pick “anonymous.”  I’ve not asked, but I suspect it wasn’t all that hard to set up.

Who does it wrong?  Lazy sites that restrict comments to registered Blogger users.  Sites based on SoapBlox or similar infrastructure that require far too many hoops to jump through to leave a simple comment.*  Sites that show a commenting option, but then say “Comments restricted to team members only” when you try to post (and, of course, there are no team members).   Sites run by such control freaks that each and every comment must be approved before posting, making it impossible to carry on any sort of conversation there.

That’s enough meta for now.  I just ask that, if you run a site where you welcome conversation, please take a look at your commenting process.  A few easy tweaks here and there could improve the conversation for everyone.  Thanks.

*Big community sites (such as DailyKos or RaisingKaine) are another matter entirely. 

Friday Notes: Iowa-free Edition

Mark Story is a photographer sharing his latest work, Living in Three Centuries: The Face of Age, online.  Most of the subjects are well over 100.  Here’s your chance to look age in the face.

~

“Have a Plan to Kill Everyone You Meet.”  That’s the sign inside a Marine forward operating base in Fallujah, and it’s posted with little – if any – irony.   It also helps provide the narrative construct in this very well written article by journalist Michael Totten.

~

Iggy Pop’s The Passenger + Peggy Lee’s Fever = musical brilliance.  (really, follow this link)

~

Early-bird registration for David Isenberg’s annual Freedom to Connect conference ends on Sunday.  I’ve been to a number of Isenberg’s events over the years, and I cannot recommend them enough.  If you’re interested in participating in a conversation (not simply hearing from) some of the top thinkers and actors in where the Internet is going, check it out.  I’ll probably write more about this later, but thought I’d give the heads up on the end of early-bird registration now.

A New Flickr Trick

Somehow, I missed the announcement of Flickr’s new stats feature. I discovered it yesterday, and am quite happy to say that it’s the most interesting addition to the Flickr service in a long time. Not only does it give you a more detailed breakdown than what was previous available under the “Popular” tab, but it also offers referral info.

If you’re a frequent Flickr user like me, you probably often wonder where all of these views come from for certain photos. I mean, it’s easy enough to sort out how a picture arrived in Explore (say, with this or that picture). But now you can see what photos are turning up through web searches (e.g., googling for the ever-popular Liz Hatch, or “You’re Doing It Wrong“). And, even better, you can see who else might be using your photos elsewhere on the web. Today I discovered that a Japanese web site is offering my picture of New York from the air (among a few other works of mine) as wallpaper for your desktop, that this article from a Chilean newspaper used a snap of mine from Pakistan in a story about Bhutto’s return, and that this blog on architecture for children found my shot of the Basilica of Our Lady of Guadalupe (in Mexico City) useful for illustration.  Unfortunately, the stats aren’t omniscient.  I still have no idea how in the world this comparatively uninteresting shot of an airplane is my fifth most popular photo.  And for photos that have simply been copied, and not linked, you’ll still have to manually search those out (I continued to be surprised at where my photos show up . . . ).

This feature is only available to “Pro” account holders at the moment, so if you’ve got one, check it out.  More info on how to activate this feature here.

A Black Hole of Meta

Aside from the underappreciated Gridskipper (and, okay, the occasional Gizmodo), I’ve long ago abandoned reading anything published by the Nick Denton House of Cards Media Empire. But this article at NYTimes.com (I know, I know, why am I still reading *them*?) caught my eye, and brought appreciation and satisfaction on a number of levels:

O.K., so people who follow this boring Manhattan media insider stuff know that the managing editor of Gawker, Choire Sicha, and his top writer-editor, Emily Gould, announced that they were quitting, in a blog post that was ostensibly about a five-year history of Gawker in n+1, the literary journal. [Gawker]

From the aforementioned five-year history by Carla Blumenkranz, now available in full: “The Gawker editors have always been forthright about the fact that what they wanted was to leave Gawker — its low pay and marginal status—and work for the people they maligned… Gawker retained the stance of a scrappy start-up and an attitude of populist resentment toward celebrities and insiders, even as it became the flagship publication of an online media empire.” [n+1]

[ . . . ]

Mr. Sicha told Women’s Wear Daily he wouldn’t mind a job “reporting on fires.” Ms. Gould’s quote: “Whatever Gawker originally set out to do, it kind of did, and now it just feels over. I would love it if it just fell off the face of the Earth… I don’t want to say the meanest thing or the most shocking thing possible anymore, because it gets so old and so soul-killing.” [WWD.com]

So, if you’ve read this far, you probably know and have an interest in the backstory and context. Tell me, doesn’t this feel good? To be clear, I’d still love to see an upstart overcome and conquer the likes of Fox and Condé Nast. But by these kids? Schadenfreude is the word, I think.

(Yes, I will probably regret this post tomorrow morning. It’s sort of like admitting that you’re following the Britney Spears custody saga.)

Selling Out Isn’t Hard

if you only offer ten units for sale.  Apparently, Amazon’s Kindle ebook reader sold out in a matter of hours.  Given its appalling 1980s aesthetics and even worse $400 price tag, I can only guess that every member of the Amazon executive team was required to buy one.  I’ve a generally very high opinion of Amazon’s business acumen, but this is a complete mess.

Credit to Romney

Looks like Mitt Romney is actually doing something useful.   I’ve long worried that copyright law would be used to control and shape not just creative expression, but public debate.  Fox is attempting to do just that, with its claims that none of the candidates can use footage from the GOP debate that it broadcast.  Romney doesn’t like it, and is fighting that, arguing that fair use rights prevents Fox from exercising full control over the footage.  What’s good for Romney also happens to be good for you and me.  These debates, as sad as they might be, are smack in the center of the ongoing public political conversation that the Constitution protects.  No one should be able to control the content of that public conversation by asserting a private copyright claim.

Dems Cave on Telecom Immunity?

[Update: Let’s put the Senate hold to a better use than porkbarrel politics – call Sen. Chris Dodd and urge him to put a hold on the FISA bill.]

If this Washington Post story is right, the Democrats have just hit the bottom of the credibility and effectiveness barrel. Handing out a blank Get Out of Jail card to telecom providers on the basis of the say-so of the Bush Administration? On *any* basis? That makes them not only fools, but dangerous fools.

This country was founded and has thrived on the rule of law. That is, the law is publicly known, and applies equally and predictably to all. You may scoff, thinking of some recent criminal case of injustice, but the rule of law really has been at the foundation of America’s success. It has provided for the certainty and safety of its people, who were not subject to the secret (and not so secret) whims and graces of individual men.

And now both the Republicans and Democrats are throwing that out in favor of . . . of *what*? What can possibly be gained by this? They’re still going to get their telecom industry contributions if they don’t do this. They’re not losing any safety – remember, this is *retroactive* immunity. So what is it? The sheer pleasure of knowing that you’re playing an integral part in deconstructing America? Didn’t want to let Bush get all the credit for that? Fools.

(When this comes down to a vote, I look forward to matching up those who vote for telecom immunity against those who voted against “amnesty” for illegal immigrants. Should be some interesting contrasts in rhetoric coming from the same people . . .).

Page 11 of 15

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén