Politics, open government, and safe streets. And the constant incursion of cycling.

Category: Law Page 21 of 27

Friday Notes: Feeling Like I’m Missing Something Edition

If you live in the US, the initials GM probably bring a car company to mind, and then likely nothing after that.  If you live in the EU, you’re probably sick to death of hearing about Genetically Modified food.  I’ve always been a bit disappointed by the lack of a public conversation about it in the US.  Not because I think that GM necessarily equals danger to human health – that’s a question of science.  Rather, I have strong societal concerns about it – something as basic as food ought not be subject to intellectual property laws, and thus controlled by a few owners.  There’s a great quick summary over at Phronesisaical, which in turn points us to this Vanity Fair article on Monsanto, describing it as:

a look at Monsanto’s approach to “protecting” its intellectual property — its phalanx of investigators and lawyers threatening farmers (and some non-farmers) who they suspect of planting their GMO seeds without paying for them.

Worth reading.

~

The Republican Party of Virginia is having its nominating convention this weekend (apparently picking their nominee is too important to be left to a statewide vote).  Waldo gives us his wishlist of results.  My favorite observation:

[G]iven a choice, Virginia Republicans will always choose wrong. Not wrong in hindsight, but wrong like should I pick up some dinner on the way home, or drive off a bridge?

Me, I’m not standing under any bridges this weekend.

~

Something I think might be informative to the recent conversation here about the death penalty is Jared Diamond’s examination of vengeance and the impact that the state has on expressing (and suppressing) one of our most powerful emotions.

More Picture Taking Idiocy

I can’t figure out whether the bigger threat to American society is the faux-security presumption against public photography or simply the feeble-minded sense of authority by middle management figures like Robert H. Mangiante, Assistant Director at IPC International Corporation and guardian of DC’s Union Station against unapproved pictures.

Friday Notes: Mad World Edition

Another of the “worst of the worst” from Guantanamo, a television cameraman, is released without charges after six years.

~

Did you know that U.S. Customs officials can stop you at the border and go rifling through every little file on your laptop, for no better reason than because they feel like it?  According to them (and the 9th Circuit), they can.  Here’s what you can (try to) do about it.

~

Read this Ta-Nehisi Coates story.  An intelligent treatment of subject that really brings out the stupid in people.

Bush Brings Teh Funny: Law Day

David Kurtz points out that it’s Law Day, U.S.A!   Putting aside the question of why U.S.A. is tacked on (perhaps it’s a form of Clapping Louder?), we’ll get straight to the amusing part.  President Bush proclaims that:

“The Rule of Law: Foundation for Communities of Opportunity and Equity,” recognizes the fundamental role that the rule of law plays in preserving liberty in our Nation and in all free societies.

Heh.  I suppose this is a perfect follow-up to George’s recent Pope-visit-inspired speech about the sanctity of life.

Winning the War on . . . What?

I think this Washington Post article on the Federal government’s inability to secure convictions in its “terrorism” cases misses the mark.  The problem, as I see it, isn’t the “early prosecution” strategy taken by the FBI/DOJ, but calling them “terrorism” cases in the first place.   For example, one of the guys recently escaped conviction in Miami had:

confided [to his grocer] that he wanted to blow up the Sears Tower in Chicago, which would then fall into a nearby prison, freeing Muslim prisoners who would become the core of his Moorish army. With them, he would establish his own country.

Certifiable lunatic?  Probably.  Real live terrorist?  Hardly.  Over and over again, we get fantastic announcements about big busts of scary terrorist plots.  And then we later find out it was a bunch of incompetent idiots who couldn’t shoplift, nevermind pull off an actual act of terrorism.

The Company We Keep

Executions, by country, for 2007:

China: 470+
Iran: 317+
Saudi: 143+
Pakistan: 135+
USA: 42
Iraq: 33+
Vietnam: 25+
Yemen: 15+
Afghanistan: 15
Libya: 9+
Japan: 9
Syria: 7+
Sudan: 7+
Bangladesh: 6
Somalia: 5+
Equatorial Guinea: 3
Singapore: 2
Kuwait: 1+
Indonesia: 1+
Botswana: 1+
Belarus: 1+
Ethiopia: 1

“+” after a number indicates that the figure is a minimum one. The true figure is at least the figure shown. For example, “47+” means that there were at least 47 executions in 2007.

ACLU: Defending American Values Against the Bush Administration

So the Wall Street Journal’s got a story highlighting the ACLU’s role in assembling defense teams for Guantanamo Bay detainees:

The American Civil Liberties Union is spearheading a high-profile effort to defend Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and other alleged 9/11 conspirators from conviction and execution by the Bush administration’s military commissions at Guantanamo Bay.

Backed by a slate of prominent legal figures, including former Attorney General Janet Reno and former Federal Bureau of Investigation Director William Webster, the ACLU has assembled a team of top civilian attorneys to supplement the military defense counsel assigned to represent Guantanamo’s “high-value detainees.”

I suspect that the ACLU is a little worried about the PR aspect of this, as they just mass emailed a statement about the story.  I think they put it perfectly:

The manner in which we seek justice against those accused of harming us will determine whether the United States will be seen at home and abroad as a nation of laws. We must decide whether we live the values of justice that make us proud to be Americans, or whether we will forsake those values and continue down a path of arbitrary rules and procedures more befitting those who are our enemies. Because we are a great nation, true to our founders’ vision, we must uphold our core values even in the toughest of times. The right to a speedy trial in a court of law before an objective arbiter; the right to due process; the right to rebut the evidence against you; the right not to be tortured or waterboarded, or convicted on the basis of hearsay evidence are what truly define America and our commitment to the rule of law and our founders’ aspirations.

The military commissions set up by the Bush administration for the men imprisoned at Guantánamo Bay — including those it suspects were involved in the September 11 attacks — are not true American justice. These trials should represent who we are, what America stands for, and our commitment to due process. They are not about how civilized the accused are, but how civilized we are. America does not stand for trials that rely on torture to gain confessions, or on secret evidence that a defendant cannot rebut, or on hearsay evidence.

For these reasons, the ACLU and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers have taken on the task of assembling defense teams to be available to assist in the representation of those Guantánamo detainees who have been charged under the Military Commissions Act, subject to the detainees’ consent.

We take this step because we simply cannot stand by and allow the Bush administration’s military commissions to make a mockery of our Constitution and our values. We believe in the American justice system — despite its imperfections and distortions by pundits, politicians and ideologues — and we believe we can make the system stronger by engaging it and fighting for what is right, fighting for fair trials and for America’s reputation.

Amen.

DC Gun Case: a Brief Clarification of Context

It seems that today’s Supreme Court hearing of the case concerning DC’s gun regulations is getting a lot of media play today.  One of the things I keep hearing is that DC only bans *handguns*, and that residents are free to keep shotguns and rifles for self defense.   And in that context, I suppose a handgun ban sounds a little more reasonable than it might otherwise.  But this simply isn’t true, in a practical sense – securing the required permit for your shotgun/rifle is ridiculously difficult (bordering on impossible), and even if you do get it, the law requires that the gun be rendered nonfunctional at all times.  There is no self-defense exception to that requirement.  So what we have, in DC, is an effective complete ban on the legal possession of any firearm for self defense.  I wish the reporting would be a little clearer on that.

From Guantanamo Chief Prosecutor to Witness for the Defense

This is an amazing story, I think, with the potential for extraordinary consequences:

Until four months ago, Col. Morris D. Davis was the chief prosecutor at Guantánamo Bay and the most colorful champion of the Bush administration’s military commission system. He once said sympathy for detainees was nauseating and compared putting them on trial to dragging “Dracula out into the sunlight.”

Then in October he had a dispute with his boss, a general. Ever since, he has been one of those critics who will not go away: a former top insider, with broad shoulders and a well-pressed uniform, willing to turn on the system he helped run.

Still in the military, he has irritated the administration, saying in articles and interviews that Pentagon officials interfered with prosecutors, exerted political pressure and approved the use of evidence obtained by torture.

Now, Colonel Davis has taken his most provocative step, completing his transformation from Guantánamo’s chief prosecutor to its new chief critic. He has agreed to testify at Guantánamo on behalf of one of the detainees, Salim Ahmed Hamdan, a driver for Osama bin Laden.

As outspoken as Col. Davis has been (remember, he’s the source for the story in which DOD Gen Counsel William Haynes blanches at the idea of a system that results in anything but a conviction), I suspect there’s a lot more to be heard.  And when might we hear it?

“I’m hoping at some point to retire, so I can say what I really think,” he said.

US Federal Judge Takes Wikileaks.org Down

It’ll be interesting to see how this resolves:

A controversial website that allows whistle-blowers to anonymously post government and corporate documents has been taken offline in the US.

Wikileaks.org, as it is known, was cut off from the internet following a California court ruling, the site says.

The case was brought by a Swiss bank after “several hundred” documents were posted about its offshore activities.

Other versions of the pages, hosted in countries such as Belgium and India, can still be accessed.

Wikileaks, in case you’ve never heard of it, has been gaining profile as the place to put information that someone is trying to keep under cover:

The site was founded in 2006 by dissidents, journalists, mathematicians and technologists from the US, Taiwan, Europe, Australia and South Africa.

It so far claims to have published more than 1.2 million documents.

Here’s a mirror of the Wikileaks site. A bit popular, at the moment.

Update: here’s a list of all the various “cover names” for the Wikileaks site.  Clearly, the court didn’t have the first idea of how these things work.

Page 21 of 27

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén