Politics, open government, and safe streets. And the constant incursion of cycling.

Category: Politics Page 69 of 73

Not Really a Voting Guide

The 2006 version of the WashCycle voting guide, here! Hey, it’s interesting if you’re a cyclist.

I think I’m pretty much done with political posts, through Tuesday. There’s nothing that’s going to change anyone’s mind about the candidates between now and then, and giving the oxygen of attention to the various ridiculous last minute ploys of desperate candidates only encourages future candidates to do the same. So I’m done, with the politics. Between now and Tuesday, I’ll be spending my time offline trying to get people out to vote, instead of persuading them how to vote. If you don’t know which Senate candidate you’re going to vote for now, well . . . I’ve not the slightest idea of what to say to you.

Of course, having knocked people for not having made up their minds, I’ve got to admit that I’m finding myself in the very same position on two other issues. First, our local school board has two excellent candidates in Sally Baird and Cecelia Espenoza, either of which will do a fine job. Baird has the Democratic endorsement, and Espenoza is (as I understand it) a Democrat running as an “Independent” because she works at the Department of Justice, whose rules essentially prohibit partisan runs for office. I’d sort of hoped that the race would evolve in a way that show the policy contrasts between the candidates, but that simply hasn’t happened. There are no easy party or demographic defaults to tip the balance, either. Not an easy choice.

The other issue is the third VA constitutional ballot question, which deals with giving VA localities the ability to offer tax incentives to developers working in “blighted” areas. Vivian Page has a good summary of the issue, and I’m leaning toward a no on the question, too. The short version of why: developers already get pretty everything they want from localities in VA, and in my view, there’s been no shortage of development in all the time I’ve lived here. There’s no need to put additional public goods on the table to encourage private developers to do something they’ve been doing already.

A Broken System

Whatever the outcome next Tuesday, our basic political system is broken. Putting aside the fact that most jurisdictions are embracing voting systems that no one should trust, the twin powers of incumbency and redistricting have been manipulated and exploited to such an extent that even now, when there are approximately three people in the entire country who approve of the job that Congress is doing, 90 something percent of them will keep their seats.

TPM Reader DK notes:

Not to rain on the parade but all the talk of dramatic Democratic gains in the House has a tendency to downplay a serious underlying structural problem. Even under the rosiest scenarios, the Democrats only pick up somewhere around 50 seats. Realistically, it looks like 25-35 pickups. The House was designed to be the national political institution most politically responsive to the people. I would venture to say that given the massive train wreck that the GOP has created in public affairs, the founders would be stunned to see so few seats change hands. If these are the kinds of political conditions it takes to move 50 House seats, then we’re in trouble.

So what will be done about it? Well, nothing. No one seems to really care. Perhaps it’s because people are too risk averse – they want to desperately (through their parties) hold on to whatever political power they have, and aren’t willing to risk the loss of some seats in the next cycle, no matter what the future benefits might be. Or perhaps it’s the structural gridlock that’s in place – Democratic California has no incentive to fairly redistrict unless Republican Texas does the same, and there are no national leaders willing to push the matter forward. Representative democracy is nice, and all, but only when it results in more votes for your party, is apparently the thinking.

Or maybe it’s just because we, as a society, don’t give a damn about democracy anymore. We have become a country where the foot of one half is on the neck of the other, which itself is just about ready to break that foot. There is no national conversation, there are no reasonable differences over policy. It’s just another war, where one side has all but declared the other at one with those who would like to see America destroyed. It’s not democracy – it’s a raw power struggle, designed solely to reward those who win that power – fuck the rest.

DK reminds us where the fault ultimately lays:

I hope that when the political history of the last half century is written it will show, as it should, that the Republicans engaged in a brand of divisive electoral politics that pitted Americans against each other: white against black, men against women, rich against poor, native born against immigrant, straight against gay. Republicans deserve to be tarred by history for exploiting our weaknesses, our prejudices, and our lesser selves for their own political gain. But those are still our weaknesses and our prejudices. We own them. And it is our lesser selves that have succumbed to the Republican political pitch and been willing to be exploited. Removing the Republicans from power will only be a temporary fix unless we fundamentally fix ourselves so that no one, no party, no movement can exploit those same weaknesses again.

Amen.

Gen. Clark, Michael J. Fox, and Jim Webb

There are better accounts of it out there,, but I wanted to share a short account of my own experience with Thursday night’s Wesley Clark/Michael J. Fox/Jim Webb rally in Arlington. To start – this is a long way from March 7th, when I first met Jim Webb at the announcement of his candidacy for the United States Senate. Considered a longshot, there was much hope in the room, but that was about it. Confidence wasn’t exactly permeating the air. Closer to the primary, at an event with Gen. Clark, Jim was gaining steam, but still a little awkward. It would be a hard fought battle, uncertain of victory.

Fast forward through a well-earned primary victory, endless criss-crossing of the commonwealth, and attacks on his fundamental character to this night. Now, on stage, I saw a Senator. Not the Hollywood caricature of a Man in Full (of himself), but of someone who absolutely wants to work for his state and country, and is committed to delivering on his promises. Here was a man I could vote for, and not just as an act against someone else.

Michael J. Fox’s endorsement was ringing – Jim Webb is someone who recognizes the importance of sound science. Someone who realizes that, in order to help our country achieve its hopes and dreams, we need to ensure that science can retake its rightful place among the endeavors we engage in to make that happen. It was an entirely positive and non-partisan endorsement. Before an enormous room of people and stage of television cameras, Fox again brought our attention to how important a role in our future, as individuals and as a society, that science plays. The cheers that followed came from a room full of people who were honestly moving forward, and not just fighting back.

I was proud, really. Proud of Jim Webb, proud of the folks at the rally, and proud of the netroots, for providing the support when no one else would. I look forward to joining everyone next Tuesday night in celebrating the fruits of his, their, and our commitment, support, and labor.

You can never be too cynical

A few months ago, I remember hearing radio stories about the administration placing a cache of Iraqi gov’t (pre-invasion) documents up on the web, hoping to “leverage” the power of the internet in analyzing the documents. I pretty much dismissed it out of hand as a publicity stunt – they’d never actually throw information out there that they hadn’t already vetted, right?

Wrong. Says the NYT:

“[T]he site has posted some documents that weapons experts say are a danger themselves: detailed accounts of Iraq’s secret nuclear research before the 1991 Persian Gulf war. The documents, the experts say, constitute a basic guide to building an atom bomb.”

Now, perhaps this is the not uncommon press hysteric (you can find out how to build a bong on the Internets!) that likes to sex up pretty much any piece of generally available information. But if this is what it appears to be . . . jesus. Have we passed the high crimes and misdemeanors threshold, yet?

Worth 4:16

A good video showing why a lot of people aren’t just voting against Allen, but for Jim Webb.

(Another great endorsement – by Daniel Dae Kim (Jin!) of Lost, here.)

P.W. Botha Dead at 90

He’s up there with George Wallace, in the too evil to forgive pantheon.

Why do evil old men live so long?

Great job, guys

Three Allen staffers tackle (really) a constituent asking Allen, “Why did you spit on your first wife?”

(And just for your own head-shaking amusement, check out this press report after you’ve watched the video. Your media in action . . .)

Update: Mike Stark (the constituent that was attacked) has a letter up at the web site of the local television station that captured the incident on tape.)

Further: The Washington Post redefines “heckling” as someone asking questions. And from the WP report, I’m getting the idea that the Charlottesville police aren’t going to be a lot of help:

“Charlottesville Police Lt. Gary Pleasants said Stark reported the incident today and indicated he wanted to press assault charges against the men. Pleasants said police are investigating and trying to determine the names of the Allen staffers involved.

“We will find out who the people are, give him the information and he can go to the magistrate and try to obtain a warrant for them,” Pleasants said.”

Ridicule

That is all people like this deserve.

Vote No: Undoing Virginia’s Bill of Rights

Virginia’s Constitution is really a work to behold. Its priorities are evident from the moment you start reading it – the first article is entitled Bill of Rights, and the very first section reads:

“That all men are by nature equally free and independent and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.”

That was written 230 years ago, before the colonies had even declared independence, nevermind adopted the U.S. Constitution. Its ideas – of liberty, independence, and equality – served as a model for many. And now those ideas are under direct attack in Virginia.

Vivian Page brings us the highlights the Virginian Pilots’ editorial against the proposed amendment that Virginia voters will be facing on November 7th:

Parse them anyway you like, but those 87 words [of the amendment] seek no less than to undo what Mason wrought in Virginia’s first days, sentiments that have stood the test of 230 years.

[…]

The mere possibility that such gracelessness might find its way into Virginia’s high-minded Bill of Rights – among protections for religious liberties, assembly and free elections – is insult enough to the commonwealth’s founding sentiments.

But the marriage amendment’s intent – to deprive unmarried people of basic legal rights otherwise guaranteed by Virginia’s constitution and by common law – makes a mockery of Mason’s hope of protecting the inherent rights of all men to be equally free and independent.

The whole editorial is here. This amendment is an abomination. Vote No, Virginia.

The politics of responsibility

Republicans are forever praising the concept of taking responsibility. You’re poor? Sick? Unlucky? That’s all your responsibility. Get hurt and are suddenly faced with $100k in medical bills you never asked for? Your responsibility.

Funny how that tune changes when it comes to corporate responsibility. Then it’s all over-regulation! Trial lawyers! Stymied innovation! Utter bullshit. If Republicans held corporations to the same standard of responsibility they do an unwed mother of two, I just might vote Republican.

As Ezra points out, it’s all about power, not principle.

Page 69 of 73

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén