Politics, open government, and safe streets. And the constant incursion of cycling.

Category: Politics Page 9 of 73

Loudoun County: Over The Line?

So I’ve been joking (sorta) about Northern Virginia seceding from the rest of Virginia since, oh, about a year after I moved to Arlington (this makes it many many years).  In my original formulation, I was all about reconstituting the original DC – it was going to be Arlington & Alexandria re-forming with the District.  Then a year or so later, I realized that Falls Church isn’t the sleepy ‘burb I thought it was, and it would be unfair to leave them suffering in Virginia, so I added them in.  And then – as all successful political strategies must do – my vision compromised a bit, and morphed to include Fairfax County.  It’s not really my kind of place (as best I can tell, anyway – I only ever see it from a bike path or Dulles Airport), but it seems to work for a lot of people, and any state I’m going to help form has to have an international airport.  So.  That’s the plan that I’ve been pushing at parties for the past decade.  Now?  Well, perhaps it’s time to consider another addition.* Loudoun County.

I know, I know.  Why would I want a place that is mostly low-tax-base horse farms** in a political unit that is otherwise urban/suburban?   And nevermind the political makeup, right?  I mean, the whole point of something like secession is being able to pick your friends, no?  For example, a friend in Loudoun recently wrote to tell me about a situation where:

A local committee was working to evaluate what to do with all the requests that come in throughout the year to use our County courthouse lawn here in Leesburg. They decided not to allow any use because there we so many applications for things such as bands. Many of the locals (many religious folks) protested because that would also mean no annual Christmas tree or nativity scene. Well the supervisors backed down to this protest and now are allowing up to 10 holiday “displays”.

Totally not the kind of place that would fit in with the new state, right?  Except, well, here are summaries for the seven applications pending for the 10 spaces available for display:

* The Veterans of Foreign Wars Post 1177, in Leesburg, has applied to put up a Christmas tree from Dec. 10 through Jan. 1. Post members would provide the tree.

* Along with the VFW, the Knights of Columbus Holy Family Council #6831, of Leesburg, is applying to place a Christmas tree from Dec. 10 to Jan. 1. The tree would be provided by the organization, which would also provide the installation and removal of the tree on the requested days.

* Leesburg resident Dennis Welsh has requested to place a crche, or Nativity scene, on the southwest corner of the grounds.

* Loudoun Interfaith Bridges has requested permission to put up an interfaith display to include a Menorah, crescent, and Sikh display to honor the Jewish, Muslim and Sikh holidays in December. The group is requesting that the display go up the week of Dec. 14 or Dec. 21, in the corner with the crche.

* Leesburg resident Richard L. Wingrove is requesting the placing of a six-foot banner provided by Freedom From Religion Foundation, saying “At This Season of the Winter Solstice, May Reason Prevail. There are no gods, no devils, no angels, no heaven or hell. There is only our natural World. Religion is but myth and superstition that hardens hearts and enslaves minds.” Wingrove is requesting the banner be placed in same area as the Nativity scene.

* Sugarland Run resident Edward R. Myers is applying for three signs to be placed on the fence around the courthouse in time for the Leesburg holiday parade to commemorate the Dec. 15 anniversary of the signing of the Bill of Rights. Myers put together a parody of the “12 Day of Christmas” song to include “12 master debaters, 11 cunning linguists, 10 percent jobless, 9 niggardly noobs, 8-speech as gay tweets, 7 teabagger tools, 6-ting safety screws, 5 birther-control rings, 4 sucky health care, 3-dom disappearing, 2 many bills and a red FCUK to you too.”

Any place that can produce that last application? Has a place in my future state.

*No, no, not Prince William.  Are you crazy?  That nutjob county is welcome to form its own country, fence and everything.  I’ll help them build it.

**Actually, I don’t know if this is true.  Like Fairfax, 95% of my experience with Loudoun is from the seat of my bike.  And?  There’s a lotta horse farms.

Protecting the Sanctity of Marriage

Hey, do you beat the shit out your girlfriend, and then drag her through the lobby of your apartment building?  Cool.  Then you, too, can vote to protect the sanctity of marriage in NY.

(And also, you pathetic Democrats?  You better not lift a finger to reelect him.)

Dan Savage Puts It in (Shockingly SFW) Simple Terms

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3KhZsMXw9I[/youtube]

He says all the right things.  And he does . . . nothing.

On The Lie That Is “Fiscal Conservative”

I used to bang my head against the wall every time I heard someone say “I’m a social liberal and a fiscal conservative.”  And then I realized I was going to need my brain for (hopefully) another 50 years.  But silly shit like this is the origin of that problem.  There are, in reality, *very* few “fiscal conservatives” (in a literal reading of the phrase) in elected office.  Rather, the phrase identifies those that cite spending/deficit/tax concerns as a reason to oppose most any social spending.  If you look at the records of the vast majority of these self-proclaimed “fiscal conservatives”, you’ll see that they go in – whole hog – for defense spending, farm subsidies, and tax cuts as if they’ve never encountered the idea of responsibility for balancing the books.  There’s no inherent fiscal conservatism there.  It’s simply someone who has latched onto a popular phrase to dishonestly explain away his behavior.

Without Irony, I Fear

Andrew Sullivan, in the context of discussing the ridiculousness that is the Weekly Standard, writes:

As for Continetti, he wouldn’t be the first young man in a hurry in Washington. You’d be amazed at what ambition can get people to write, even in earnest.

See also, Andrew Sullivan in 1994.

Idiocracy on the March: Poll Says Majority of Republicans Believe ACORN Stole Election for Obama

From TPM:

The new national poll from Public Policy Polling (D) has an astonishing number about paranoia among the GOP base: Republicans do not think President Obama actually won the 2008 election — instead, ACORN stole it.

[ . . . ]

The poll asked this question: “Do you think that Barack Obama legitimately won the Presidential election last year, or do you think that ACORN stole it for him?” The overall top-line is legitimately won 62%, ACORN stole it 26%.

Among Republicans, however, only 27% say Obama actually won the race, with 52% — an outright majority — saying that ACORN stole it, and 21% are undecided.

Just . . . yeah.

The Grand Old Pity Party

Colbert nails it:

The Colbert Report Mon – Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
The Word – Grand Old Pity Party
www.colbertnation.com

“Columbus go home! Columbus go home!”

Well done, friend, well done.

Sullivan: Still A Sucker

I admit it – I’ve been reading (and enjoying) Andrew Sullivan for at least a year now, despite my full knowledge of a what execrable fellow he was with respect the question of Iraq.  I thought, perhaps, that he’d learned his lesson.  Turns out, no.  Still a complete sucker for con. positions that masquerade as well-meaning. Same as it ever was.

Jim Webb Disappoints. Again.

This time, Webb is hedging on the capacity of the American justice system to handle terrorists. It’s interesting. He’s wrong as wrong can be, but I believe it’s genuine. That is, he’s genuinely wrong, and not wrong because of political considerations.

Page 9 of 73

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén