Politics, open government, and safe streets. And the constant incursion of cycling.

Category: Personal Page 42 of 59

Bardo: The End Is Near

Dr. Dremo's

This month will see the end of another Arlington institution: Dr. Dremo‘s (nee Ningaloo nee Bardo Rodeo) is closing. They’re advertising a staff reunion* for this Saturday (Jan. 12th), and the last day is Jan. 26th (well, technically, Jan. 27th, as they close at 2am). I can’t tell you how much I love this place. It saw me through law school and job stress while helping me celebrate birthdays and friendships. Stop by for a pitcher of Racer X or Bardo’s own James Brown Ale and an hour at the pool tables before they go.

*mmmhmm.

Perfect Day

Perfect Day

Yesterday was absolutely beautiful. The very best I could ask of from a January day in DC. So, instead of working, I went for a ride.  Titles come up when you mouseover frame (but not photo, it seems):

City livingCapital Crescent TrailNote to self:Dalecaria TunnelWisconsin Ave

Local wildlifeNational Zoo ClockConnecticut Avenue, from belowFemale Union Band Society GraveyardK St as it should be

RosslynStill have not figured out how to ride this partC&O CanalBusy intersectionNew Dixie Liquor

Approach to NationalKey to RosslynStill GeorgetownEarl of SandwichU Like

Self PortraitMercado LatinoMy exIotaCan't Capture Everything

Try it yourself, some time.

Apropos

On Commenting

I discovered a new dimension to my recent frustration with Google, today.   In addition to being arbitrarily locked out of web mail, site stats, and browser syncing, I’m no longer able to comment on blogs that only permit comments from registered Blogger users.  Like the other items, however, this is more of an inconvenience than a real loss, as I generally don’t participate on sites that require registration to comment.   However, I tried to offer something substantive and useful (an exception, I know) on another site concerning the FCC’s approach to the multiple ownership rules, only to discover that it wouldn’t post because, well, Google hates me (temporarily, I hope).  That’s a real shame, I think.

Registration for comments is cumbersome and time consuming, and it provides yet another vector through which an email address can be lost to the aggressions of spam lists.  I suspect that the proprietors of most sites with registration requirements don’t realize that they’re closing the doors to many would-be commenters.   Further, to the extent that registration requirements are imposed to prevent spam or ban certain people, those can be efficiently handled on the back-end without too much work (ask anyone who uses Akismet, for example).

So what do I like?  Open comments that permit a user to pick her own name, attach a URL (if desired), and aren’t moderated by default.  An option to be notified of future comments on that thread is gravy (which I recently added here, by the way).  This can be one of many identity options in a commenting system including Blogger, OpenID, etc., but it should always be an option.

Who does it right?  Well, most anyone with an open commenting system.  It’s easy to participate at any of these places, because they’ve chosen to offer simple and open commenting.  A good example of a hybrid system is over at the Freewheeling Spirit, where not only do you have the option of simply using your own chosen ID and url, but you can pick from a plethora of existing ID systems that you probably already use (e.g., OpenID, Blogger, Typepad, etc.).  And, for gravy, you can simply pick “anonymous.”  I’ve not asked, but I suspect it wasn’t all that hard to set up.

Who does it wrong?  Lazy sites that restrict comments to registered Blogger users.  Sites based on SoapBlox or similar infrastructure that require far too many hoops to jump through to leave a simple comment.*  Sites that show a commenting option, but then say “Comments restricted to team members only” when you try to post (and, of course, there are no team members).   Sites run by such control freaks that each and every comment must be approved before posting, making it impossible to carry on any sort of conversation there.

That’s enough meta for now.  I just ask that, if you run a site where you welcome conversation, please take a look at your commenting process.  A few easy tweaks here and there could improve the conversation for everyone.  Thanks.

*Big community sites (such as DailyKos or RaisingKaine) are another matter entirely. 

Travel Music: Hong Kong

Music from a few dreamlike days in Hong Kong. Click on any track for it to play. The Chemical Brothers’ Where Do I Begin is in my lifetime top 10.


Testing out something I’ve long wanted to do. It appears to be working from this end, but if it’s odd on your end, let me know? (And “odd” *definitely* includes unprompted audio. I hate that.) Thanks.

What have you changed your mind about?

Slashdot highlighted this fantastic collection of responses to that question, posed by the Edge World Question Center to a wide (and impressive) array of people. I was unknowingly familiar with previous work of this organization, having read and enjoyed What We Believe But Cannot Prove.  Apparently this is an annual exercise, with this year’s question being “What have you changed your mind about?” A few of the responses include Georgetown Provost James O’Donnell’s telling us that he’s “stopped cheering for the Romans“, Douglas Rushkoff explaining why he isn’t so sure the Internet will change people anymore, and Alan Alda revealing that he’s changed his mind about God. Twice.

It’s a fascinating set of responses, and I suspect I’ll be spending a decent bit of time reading them over the next week.  It happens that I’ve been working on getting my old archives (both from previous solo efforts and group blogs) into shape for adding here, and it’s given me reason to consider my changing political principles over the years.  I hope my own (eventual) writing on the subject can be as thoughtful as some of these responses.

Happy New Year

A year ago, I rang in the new year with some of my closest friends by unloading a few guns into the sky of Karachi.  This new year’s eve – which I had hoped to also spend with some of my closest friends – will instead be a quiet one at home in Arlington, as I nurse an unpleasant cold. Not the closing bookend I’ve have chosen, but on the whole, it’s been a good year.

Here’s to the same for you and yours in 2008.

Credit Card Foreign Transaction Fee Settlement

A bit on NPR just reminded me of a bit of paperwork that I have to complete. Well, me and maybe 30 million other people. As you may already know, there is a proposed settlement for a pending class action suit involving anyone who made a foreign purchase with a credit card between February 1, 1996 and November 8, 2006. Assuming that the proposed settlement is approved by the court, class members will received a refund of part of the foreign transaction fee that was charged any time they used a US credit card outside of the US.

I received my first notice about this some time ago. However, I didn’t think I’d end up taking advantage of it, as you not only had to know when you traveled, but you had to have your actual credit card records substantiating each transaction. I don’t know about you, but I don’t keep my credit cards records for 10+ years. I know what I did last year. 1997? Not so clear.

However, the most recent settlement draft seems to have simplified things greatly. Roughly, you can:

  1. take a straight $25 settlement if you traveled outside the US at least once in this period (and simply swear to that fact);
  2. get a somewhat larger settlement based on a declaration of how many total days you spent outside the US during that period (the settlement will be based on an estimated average figured out by the credit card companies and class action representatives); or
  3. provide a substantiated record of how much money you actually spent outside of the US during that period, and receive a refund of the fees actually charged.

I suspect I’d probably end up with a larger settlement if I could substantiate all of my spending, but that would involve such a ridiculous amount of time and effort that I’m going to opt for option 2 (which, for the most part, is simply a matter of going through my passports and deciphering the visa stamps). I encourage fellow travelers to take the time to participate in this settlement. It was conventional wisdom (encouraged by the credit card companies) that you received the best exchange rate by using your credit card overseas. While that may be technically true, their tacking on of unpublicized fees certainly made that a moot point. Make sure they have to pay for that deception.

More info at the official settlement site (tho’ really, doesn’t that look like a scam site? It’s not.) Court approval of the settlement could come, at the earliest, on March 31st. Checks go out after approval.

Also, this is not legal advice, I am not your lawyer, etc.

Overnight Music: Quo Vadimus

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEhDtePc1ow&feature=related[/youtube]

Friday Notes: I kinda want . . .

. . . the Ron Paul Blimp to attempt to enter restricted DC airspace and get shot down. I can only imagine the sound of the heads of Ron Paul supporters popping across the country.

. . . the GOP primary to turn into an all out religious war. Really, let’s have a full examination of the actual religious beliefs of the candidates. Giuliani could ask Mitt just how gullible you have to be to believe that con artist, Joseph Smith. And then Mitt could hold up a glass of wine and say “Dude, are you telling me that you really think you’re drinking BLOOD?!” And it would be a grand old time.*

. . . someone to put together a Greatest Hits of the 90’s video so Democrats can be reminded that the GOP machine isn’t just willing to lie about issues of international importance, but about pretty much every little thing. Josh Marshall, in the context of Huckabee’s efforts at rewriting the story of how he encouraged the parole of a serial rapist, reminds us:

Most of our staff at TPM are in their twenties. And we had a moment today when it occurred to me that if you weren’t politically aware in the 1990s, it’s difficult to get a sense of how much a series of seriously deranged conspiracy theories became almost mainstream.

*Except not really. I don’t think that that would be the public conversation – it would inevitably narrowly focus on Mormonism. And while I’m perfectly happy to examine some of the more ridiculous bits of the story underlying Mormonism, I don’t want it to be just Mormonism. If we do that, we’re just doing more of the evangelical right’s dirty work for them. The necessary conversation is bigger than politics, but in this case, it would only serve politics. So I kinda want it, but not really.

Page 42 of 59

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén