Politics, open government, and safe streets. And the constant incursion of cycling.

Category: Society Page 54 of 69

Police State: Keeping You Scared

Maybe the use of the term “police state” is a bit overwrought. The US isn’t one right now (but we certainly are a surveillance society). But every time I see a story like this, or this, I’m reminded that we’re slouching toward that police state.  What did I just link? Well, the first was about this program, which Cory Doctorow has appropriately recognized as “facecrime“:

TSA screeners are learning to recognize set of secret, forbidden facial expressions. If your face slips into one of these during a TSA inspection, you will be taken off and given a thorough, secondary screening

[ . . . ]

TSA officials will not reveal specific behaviors identified by the program — called SPOT (Screening Passengers by Observation Technique) — that are considered indicators of possible terrorist intent.

But a central task is to recognize microfacial expressions — a flash of feelings that in a fraction of a second reflects emotions such as fear, anger, surprise or contempt, said Carl Maccario, who helped start the program for TSA.

Now, I don’t believe for a second that a few days of training (which is all they’re getting) is going to turn any of the TSA employees I’ve ever met into someone capable of making that judgment. But that’s really not the point of this program (or the public announcement of it). The point is twofold – first, to continue the security theater efforts at making the public feel like the government is doing something to keep them safe, and second, to continue to keep the public fearful enough that it doesn’t object to the first.  Impressively self sustaining, no?

The second story, however, is my favorite. It can be summed up with this picture:

FBI Billboard

This is part of the FBI’s new digital billboard alert program.  And you can see how it checks off all the requirements, just in this picture alone.  It’s attention catching, it’s got the scary brown man with a vaguely Arabic name, and it reminds you that there are bad people out there who will hurt you.   Whoever picked this out as an example surely has a fine career ahead of him or her.

These billboards are not just going to be fancy versions of the old post office wanted posters.  No, they’re going to actively participate in your life:

Billboards will also be used to display “high security messages to relevant communities” and the FBI also plans to establish a “protocol” for high priority “hot pursuit” messages to run straight after crimes are committed.

I feel safer already.  You?

What have you changed your mind about?

Slashdot highlighted this fantastic collection of responses to that question, posed by the Edge World Question Center to a wide (and impressive) array of people. I was unknowingly familiar with previous work of this organization, having read and enjoyed What We Believe But Cannot Prove.  Apparently this is an annual exercise, with this year’s question being “What have you changed your mind about?” A few of the responses include Georgetown Provost James O’Donnell’s telling us that he’s “stopped cheering for the Romans“, Douglas Rushkoff explaining why he isn’t so sure the Internet will change people anymore, and Alan Alda revealing that he’s changed his mind about God. Twice.

It’s a fascinating set of responses, and I suspect I’ll be spending a decent bit of time reading them over the next week.  It happens that I’ve been working on getting my old archives (both from previous solo efforts and group blogs) into shape for adding here, and it’s given me reason to consider my changing political principles over the years.  I hope my own (eventual) writing on the subject can be as thoughtful as some of these responses.

A New Flickr Trick

Somehow, I missed the announcement of Flickr’s new stats feature. I discovered it yesterday, and am quite happy to say that it’s the most interesting addition to the Flickr service in a long time. Not only does it give you a more detailed breakdown than what was previous available under the “Popular” tab, but it also offers referral info.

If you’re a frequent Flickr user like me, you probably often wonder where all of these views come from for certain photos. I mean, it’s easy enough to sort out how a picture arrived in Explore (say, with this or that picture). But now you can see what photos are turning up through web searches (e.g., googling for the ever-popular Liz Hatch, or “You’re Doing It Wrong“). And, even better, you can see who else might be using your photos elsewhere on the web. Today I discovered that a Japanese web site is offering my picture of New York from the air (among a few other works of mine) as wallpaper for your desktop, that this article from a Chilean newspaper used a snap of mine from Pakistan in a story about Bhutto’s return, and that this blog on architecture for children found my shot of the Basilica of Our Lady of Guadalupe (in Mexico City) useful for illustration.  Unfortunately, the stats aren’t omniscient.  I still have no idea how in the world this comparatively uninteresting shot of an airplane is my fifth most popular photo.  And for photos that have simply been copied, and not linked, you’ll still have to manually search those out (I continued to be surprised at where my photos show up . . . ).

This feature is only available to “Pro” account holders at the moment, so if you’ve got one, check it out.  More info on how to activate this feature here.

Opting Out

Whenever I hear someone say that they don’t pay attention to the news or politics, usually because “it doesn’t affect me” and “there’s nothing I can do about all the bad news anyway,” they become – to me – part of the problem. True, personal ignorance may well be bliss in the short term, but we are all paying a very real price for that collective indulgence in ignorance. And it can only get worse, so long as people fail to put even minimal efforts into being responsible citizens. I think it’s absolutely unconscionable to live in and benefit from a society without putting a bit of time and effort into its common management and benefit.

That said, I *do* understand and appreciate the pleasures of opting out. When I travel, I do my best to actively avoid any news that doesn’t involve my host country or next destination. For me, there is something quite satisfying about not knowing about the latest idiotic Administration move, or next bit of campaign pandering, or manufactured bit of faux outrage from some astroturf interest group. So, for some time, I do know and enjoy the bliss of ignorance. And to that end, I’ll be indulging myself in that bliss over the next couple of weeks. I’m off to [somewhere], and – save for the posting of a few nearly-finished drafts here and there (airports are good for that sort of thing) – I’m heading offline. Happy holidays to all.

Good Job, New Jersey

The New Jersey legislature has banned the death penalty, and it will soon be law.  I hope more states will follow New Jersey’s lead.

Overnight Music: Quo Vadimus

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEhDtePc1ow&feature=related[/youtube]

Friday Notes: I kinda want . . .

. . . the Ron Paul Blimp to attempt to enter restricted DC airspace and get shot down. I can only imagine the sound of the heads of Ron Paul supporters popping across the country.

. . . the GOP primary to turn into an all out religious war. Really, let’s have a full examination of the actual religious beliefs of the candidates. Giuliani could ask Mitt just how gullible you have to be to believe that con artist, Joseph Smith. And then Mitt could hold up a glass of wine and say “Dude, are you telling me that you really think you’re drinking BLOOD?!” And it would be a grand old time.*

. . . someone to put together a Greatest Hits of the 90’s video so Democrats can be reminded that the GOP machine isn’t just willing to lie about issues of international importance, but about pretty much every little thing. Josh Marshall, in the context of Huckabee’s efforts at rewriting the story of how he encouraged the parole of a serial rapist, reminds us:

Most of our staff at TPM are in their twenties. And we had a moment today when it occurred to me that if you weren’t politically aware in the 1990s, it’s difficult to get a sense of how much a series of seriously deranged conspiracy theories became almost mainstream.

*Except not really. I don’t think that that would be the public conversation – it would inevitably narrowly focus on Mormonism. And while I’m perfectly happy to examine some of the more ridiculous bits of the story underlying Mormonism, I don’t want it to be just Mormonism. If we do that, we’re just doing more of the evangelical right’s dirty work for them. The necessary conversation is bigger than politics, but in this case, it would only serve politics. So I kinda want it, but not really.

A Black Hole of Meta

Aside from the underappreciated Gridskipper (and, okay, the occasional Gizmodo), I’ve long ago abandoned reading anything published by the Nick Denton House of Cards Media Empire. But this article at NYTimes.com (I know, I know, why am I still reading *them*?) caught my eye, and brought appreciation and satisfaction on a number of levels:

O.K., so people who follow this boring Manhattan media insider stuff know that the managing editor of Gawker, Choire Sicha, and his top writer-editor, Emily Gould, announced that they were quitting, in a blog post that was ostensibly about a five-year history of Gawker in n+1, the literary journal. [Gawker]

From the aforementioned five-year history by Carla Blumenkranz, now available in full: “The Gawker editors have always been forthright about the fact that what they wanted was to leave Gawker — its low pay and marginal status—and work for the people they maligned… Gawker retained the stance of a scrappy start-up and an attitude of populist resentment toward celebrities and insiders, even as it became the flagship publication of an online media empire.” [n+1]

[ . . . ]

Mr. Sicha told Women’s Wear Daily he wouldn’t mind a job “reporting on fires.” Ms. Gould’s quote: “Whatever Gawker originally set out to do, it kind of did, and now it just feels over. I would love it if it just fell off the face of the Earth… I don’t want to say the meanest thing or the most shocking thing possible anymore, because it gets so old and so soul-killing.” [WWD.com]

So, if you’ve read this far, you probably know and have an interest in the backstory and context. Tell me, doesn’t this feel good? To be clear, I’d still love to see an upstart overcome and conquer the likes of Fox and Condé Nast. But by these kids? Schadenfreude is the word, I think.

(Yes, I will probably regret this post tomorrow morning. It’s sort of like admitting that you’re following the Britney Spears custody saga.)

Overnight Music

Working late here, with some trash TV on in the background. Another VH1 rehash. But then this clip comes on:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-bvgv3g__Y[/youtube]

It’s an amazing performance, and (I think) a fair analog of the man. He starts out a little off and hesitant. Gets stronger, but some doubts remain. And then, he gets there. Some place the rest of us never could, but recognize nonetheless. It’s amazing. Man, did we lose something when we lost him.

(Title and concept stolen from Atrios a long time ago. Just now got around to making the theft public.)

What Kind of Anti-Gay Are You?

Slate hosts this hilarious Mark Fiore cartoon, in which Right-Wing Ralphie (he’s not gay!) helps you figure out whether you’re a Bicivil Libertarian or a Questioning Demosexual.  Brilliant.

(Link leads to a flash player, requiring sound)

Page 54 of 69

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén