Every Democrat in the country better be ready for a barrage of gun control questions between now and the general election next year. Why? The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case that goes to the core of the Second Amendment, which reads:
A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Vastly oversimplifying things, it’s about whether the “right to bear arms” is a right that you – as an individual – have, or whether the right to bear arms is only as part of a “well-regulated Militia” (which is then up to the States to define). If there is an *individual* right to bear arms, then many of the existing restrictions on gun acquisition and ownership may well be found unconstitutional. I think it’s a perfectly valid question, and something that the Supreme Court has been avoiding for years. So I’m happy to see that it will be sorted out. As a lawyer, anyway.
But the real harm here is going to be the reinsertion of the “Democrats want to take your guns away!” canard into the political sphere. If ever it was true, it certainly hasn’t been true for decades. Yet it remained a regular (and effective) rallying cry for the GOP (a wholly owned subsidiary of the NRA, for the purpose of this issue). It had faded, in recent years, and I was glad to see that. But look for this case to put it front and center again. Democrats need to prepare to ready, aim, and fire back.